Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31752899›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2019

Organisational factors that facilitate research use in public health policy-making: a scoping review.

Mette Winge Jakobsen, Leena Eklund Karlsson, Thomas Skovgaard, Arja R Aro

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Policymakers' Research Capacities, Engagement, and Use of Research in Public Health Policymaking.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mette Winge JakobsenUnit for Health Promotion Research, University of Southern Denmark, Niels Bohrs Vej 9, DK-6700, Esbjerg, Denmark. mwjakobsen@health.sdu.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6972-9244
Leena Eklund KarlssonUnit for Health Promotion Research, University of Southern Denmark, Niels Bohrs Vej 9, DK-6700, Esbjerg, Denmark.
Thomas SkovgaardDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, Research and Innovation Centre for Human Movement and Learning and Research Unit for Active Living, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230, Odense M, Denmark.
Arja R AroUnit for Health Promotion Research, University of Southern Denmark, Niels Bohrs Vej 9, DK-6700, Esbjerg, Denmark.

Funding

FP7 Health 281532
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough important syntheses and theoretical works exist in relation to understanding the organisational factors that facilitate research use, these contributions differ in their scope and object of study as well as their theoretical underpinnings. Therefore, from an exploratory angle, it may be useful to map out the current literature on organisational factors of research use in public health policy-making when revisiting existing theories and frameworks to gain further theoretical insights.

methodsHerein, a scoping review technique and thematic content analysis were used to bring together findings from both synthesised and empirical studies of different types to map out the organisational factors that facilitate research use in public health policy-making.

resultsA total of 14 reviews and 40 empirical studies were included in the analysis. These were thematically coded and the intra-organisational factors reported as enabling research use were examined. Five main categories of organisational factors that advance research use in policy organisations - (1) individual factors, (2) the management of research integration, (3) organisational systems and infrastructures of research use, (4) institutional structures and rules for policy-making, and (5) organisational characteristics - were derived as well as 18 subcategories and a total of 64 specific factors, where 27 factors were well supported by research.

conclusionsUsing a scoping review methodology, the intra-organisational factors influencing research use in policy-making (including individual factors) were systematically mapped and the theories applied in this area of research were assessed. The review findings confirm the importance of an intra-organisational perspective when exploring research use, showing that many organisational factors are critical facilitators of research use but also that many factors and mechanisms are understudied. The synthesis shows a lack of studies on politicians and the need for more theoretically founded research. Despite increased efforts to update the existing evidential and theoretical basis of research use, we still need frameworks that combine different approaches and theories to help us grasp the complex organisational mechanisms that facilitate research use in policy settings.

Indexed as

Health PolicyPolicy MakingPublic HealthTranslational Research, Biomedicalevidence-based policyhealth policyindividual research capacityknowledge translationorganisational research capacityorganisational research useResearch utilisationscoping study

Identifiers

PMID31752899
PMCPMC6869261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.