Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31752858›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

Not being heard: barriers to high quality unplanned hospital care during young people's transition to adult services - evidence from 'this sickle cell life' research.

Alicia Renedo, Sam Miles, Subarna Chakravorty, Andrea Leigh, Paul Telfer, John O Warner, Cicely Marston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Stuck in transit: A qualitative study of the transitional care needs of young people with epilepsy and juvenile idiopathic arthritis.Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Bio-Politics and Calculative Technologies in COVID-19 Governance: Reflections From England.International journal of health policy and management · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alicia RenedoLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Sam MilesLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Subarna ChakravortyKing's College Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.
Andrea LeighUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Paul TelferBarts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
John O WarnerCollaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care NW London, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Cicely MarstonLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Cicely.marston@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5529-4646

Funding

Department of Health 13/54/25Health Services Research Programme 13/54/25
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundYoung people's experiences of healthcare as they move into adult services can have a major impact on their health, and the transition period for young people with sickle cell disease (SCD) needs improvement. In this study, we explore how young people with SCD experience healthcare during this period of transition.

methodsWe conducted a co-produced longitudinal qualitative study, including 80 interviews in 2016-2017 with young people with SCD aged 13-21 (mean age 16.6) across two cities in England. We recruited 48 participants (30 female, 18 male): 27 interviews were one-off, and 53 were repeated 2-3 times over approximately 18 months. We used an inductive analytical approach, combining elements of Grounded Theory and thematic analysis.

resultsParticipants reported significant problems with the care they received in A&E during painful episodes, and in hospital wards as inpatients during unplanned healthcare. They experienced delays in being given pain relief and their basic care needs were not always met. Participants said that non-specialist healthcare staff did not seem to know enough about SCD and when they tried to work with staff to improve care, staff often seemed not prepared to listen to them or act on what they said. Participants said they felt out of place in adult wards and uncomfortable with the differences in adult compared with paediatric wards. Because of their experiences, they tried to avoid being admitted to hospital, attempting to manage their painful episodes at home and accessing unplanned hospital care only as a last resort. By contrast, they did not report having problems within SCD specialist services during planned, routine care.

conclusionsOur study underscores the need for improvements to make services youth-friendly and youth-responsive, including training staff in SCD-specific care, compassionate care and communication skills that will help them elicit and act on young people's voices to ensure they are involved in shaping their own healthcare. If young people are prevented from using transition skills (self-management, self-advocacy), or treated by staff who they worry do not have enough medical competency in their condition, they may well lose their trust in services, potentially compromising their own health.

Indexed as

Quality of Health CareTransition to Adult CareAdolescentAnemia, Sickle CellEmergency Medical ServicesEmpathyEnglandFemaleHospitalizationHumansInterviews as TopicLongitudinal StudiesMalePainPain ManagementProfessional-Patient RelationsAdolescentsChronic illnessCommunity involvementLong-term conditionsPatient involvementPatient participationPeople-centred healthcareSickle cell diseaseTransitionYoung people

Identifiers

PMID31752858
PMCPMC6873494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.