Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31752853›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

Satisfaction with use of public health and peer-led facilities for HIV prevention services by key populations in Nigeria.

Bartholomew Ochonye, Morenike Oluwatoyin Folayan, Adesegun O Fatusi, Godwin Emmanuel, Oluwatomi Adepoju, Babatunde Ajidagba, Toluwanimi Jaiyebo, Paul Umoh, Ayo Yusuf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Shinyanga Patient: A Patient's Journey through HIV Treatment Cascade in Rural Tanzania.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Bartholomew OchonyeHeartland Alliance International, Abuja, Nigeria.
Morenike Oluwatoyin FolayanNew HIV Vaccine and Microbicide Advocacy Society, Lagos, Nigeria. toyinukpong@yahoo.co.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9008-7730
Adesegun O FatusiCollege Research and Partnership Advancement (CoRPA) Office, College of Health Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Godwin EmmanuelHeartland Alliance International, Abuja, Nigeria.
Oluwatomi AdepojuAcademy for Health Development (AHEAD), Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Babatunde AjidagbaAcademy for Health Development (AHEAD), Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Toluwanimi JaiyeboHeartland Alliance International, Abuja, Nigeria.
Paul UmohHeartland Alliance International, Abuja, Nigeria.
Ayo YusufHeartland Alliance International, Abuja, Nigeria.
Obafemi Awolowo University · NGYahoo (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (CH) NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of the study was to identify the proportion of female sex workers, men who have sex with men, and people who inject drugs who had accessed HIV prevention services at public health facilities and peer-led facilities, their level of satisfaction with these services, and perceived barriers and challenges to accessing HIV services from public and peer-led HIV prevention service providers.

methodsA mixed-method approach was used to collect data from key populations in the four states in Nigeria. Quantitative data collected included level of satisfaction with and barriers to use of public and peer-led facilities. In-depth interviews and focus-group discussions were conducted to explore reasons for satisfaction with and barriers to use of services. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were was conducted for quantitative data. Qualitative data were summaried, emerging themes identified, described and quotes reflecting the themes corresponding to interview questions highlighted.

resultsNine hundred sixty-seven persons responded to questions on the use of public health or/and peer-led facilities. Two hundred thirty-eight (49.4%) respondents had received HIV and sexual and reproductive health services through public health facilities, and 236 (48.7%) had received the services through peer-led facilities. Significantly more respondents were satisfied with the quality of services provided by peer-led organisations than with public health facilities with respect to service providers listening to respondent's problems and concerns (p = 0.007),privacy and confidentiality (p = 0.04) and respect of rights of service recipients (p = 0.04). Significantly more respondents using peer-led organisations than those using public health facilities identified no barriers to service access (p = 0.003). More respondents using public health facilities than peer-led facilities identified cost of services (p = 0.01), confidentiality (p = 0.002), waiting time (p < 0.01) and staff attitude (p = 0.001) as barriers to service access. Thee was no difference in the proportion of respondents willing to discontinue their use of either facilities (p = 0.08). Qualitative data revealed that concerns with access of services at the public health facility were due mainly to stigma and the effects of the same-sex prohibition law.

conclusionKey populations were more satisfied receiving HIV prevention services at peer-led organisations than at public health facilities.

Indexed as

Peer GroupPublic Health AdministrationAdultDrug UsersFemaleHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleNigeriaPatient SatisfactionQualitative ResearchSex WorkersHealth servicesHIV prevention servicesKey populationsNigeriaPeer-led organisationsPublic-health facilitiesSame-sex prohibition lawStigma

Identifiers

PMID31752853
PMCPMC6868772
OpenAlexW2989978644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.