Observational studyBMC public health2019
Energy drinks and population health: consumption pattern and adverse effects among Saudi population.
Observational study in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Sugar Reduction Initiatives in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: A Systematic Review.Nutrients · 2022Pooled it
- Energy Drinks and Arrhythmias in Adolescents and Young Adults: A Narrative Review of the Last Decade.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Energy drink consumption among Kabul University students: a cross-sectional study of prevalence, patterns, awareness, and adverse health effects.Harm reduction journal · 2026Observational
- Effects of energy drinks on fertility, blood parameters and perinatal physiology in female rats.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2026Article
- Energy Drink Knowledge, Consumption, and Regulation Support Among Polish Medical and Non-Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Regulatory Efforts and Health Implications of Energy Drink Consumption by Minors in Poland.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Review
- Factors Influencing Energy Drink Usage Amongst Pupils in the Mahikeng Sub-District, Northwest.Nutrients · 2025Article
- No significant gender differences in driving-related skills following alcohol mixed with energy drinks during an experimental binge-drinking episode.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Attitudes and consumption habits of energy drinks among adolescents and young adults in a Spanish population.AIMS public health · 2025Article
- Energy drinks in Tamale: Understanding youth perceptions, consumption patterns, and related factors.PloS one · 2024Article
- B Vitamins, Glucoronolactone and the Immune System: Bioavailability, Doses and Efficiency.Nutrients · 2023Review
- Article
- Energy drink consumption among medical students of Taif University.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2022Article
- Article
- Caffeinated beverage consumption among adolescents in Sagamu, Nigeria: implications for health promotion.The Pan African medical journal · 2022Article
- Knowledge, Consumption Pattern, and Adverse Effects of Energy Drinks among Asian Population: A Cross-Sectional Analysis from Malaysia.Journal of nutrition and metabolism · 2022Article
- Interaction of Energy Drinks with Prescription Medication and Drugs of Abuse.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
- Prevalence of energy drink consumption and association with dietary habits among governmental university students in Riyadh.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2021Article
- Investigation of the effects of different beverages on the disintegration time of over-the-counter medications in Saudi Arabia.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2021Article
- Knowledge and prevalence of energy drinks consumption in Shanghai, China: a cross-sectional survey of adolescents.General psychiatry · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCaffeine containing energy drinks (EDs) are heavily consumed, particularly among young adults. The number of reports of caffeine intoxication from caffeinated EDs and problems related to caffeine dependence and withdrawal is increasing. The objective was to assess the knowledge and perceived beneficial effects of EDs consumers, to assess consumption patterns and determine the adverse effects experienced by different EDs consumer groups residing in Saudi Arabia.
methodsAn observational cross-sectional study with data from a randomly selected Saudi population was conducted during the period of January 15th, 2015, to April 15th, 2015, using a pre-tested 43-item questionnaire. The data were obtained and collected using interview questionnaires. Sociodemographic characteristics and data on EDs consumption patterns, the level of awareness among study subjects, and the purported benefits and reported adverse effects of EDs were collected. Frequency, percentage, and arithmetic means were calculated using Chi-square and ANOVA tests, and data with p < 0.05 were considered significant.
resultsOf the 816 individuals invited to participate in the study, 783 participants responded and completed interviews, response rate was 96%. Consumers attributed the popularity of EDs to massive advertising media (46.7%) and their stimulating and invigorating effects (37.5%). EDs are consumed by subjects for their effects on fatigue reduction (64.6%), increased alertness and focus (75.8%), and assistance during long driving trips (75.7%). Study subjects reported suffering from adverse effects, including mainly diuresis (53.7%), palpitations (50.7%), insomnia (50.7%). Importantly, an inverse association was identified between knowledge of EDs and consumption rate, and a proportional association was identified between experienced adverse effects and consumption frequency. Lower knowledge scores were identified in daily consumers than in 1-3 times monthly consumers; higher adverse events were experienced by daily consumers than by 1-3 times monthly consumers. The majority of consumers (84.6%) recommended that authorities should regulate EDs consumption.
conclusionsExcessive EDs consumption is associated with an increased risk of experiencing several adverse events, which is commensurate with published studies. Increasing knowledge about EDs and their possible risks could decrease their consumption by the general public.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.