Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31752759›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2019

The role of vascular mimicry as a biomarker in malignant melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhenhua Zhang, Saber Imani, Marzieh Dehghan Shasaltaneh, Hossein Hosseinifard, Linglin Zou, Yu Fan, Qinglian Wen

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Histochemical Staining of Vasculogenic Mimicry.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Tumor Vessels Fuel the Fire in Glioblastoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. sFRP2 Supersedes VEGF as an Age-related Driver of Angiogenesis in Melanoma, Affecting Response to Anti-VEGF Therapy in Older Patients.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhenhua ZhangDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou City, Sichuan Province, 646000, People's Republic of China.
Saber ImaniDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou City, Sichuan Province, 646000, People's Republic of China.
Marzieh Dehghan ShasaltanehDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran.
Hossein HosseinifardResearch Center for Evidence Based Medicine (RCEBM), Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Linglin ZouDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou City, Sichuan Province, 646000, People's Republic of China.
Yu FanDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou City, Sichuan Province, 646000, People's Republic of China.
Qinglian WenDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou City, Sichuan Province, 646000, People's Republic of China. wql73115@hotmail.com.
Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University · CNTabriz University of Medical Sciences · IRUniversity of Zanjan · IR

Funding

Southwest Medical University Grant No, 18080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVasculogenic mimicry (VM) a microvascular system consisting of non-endothelial cells that is newly formed by aggressive tumors, has been proposed as an important therapeutic target in malignant melanoma (MM). We performed a systematic literature review to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of VM status for overall survival of MM patients.

methodsThe quality of the included studies was evaluated using the QUADAS-2 tool. Diagnostic capacity of VM variables, including sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the area under summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC), were pooled using Meta-DiSc software.

resultsA retrospective observational study was conducted based on twelve clinical studies including 978 clinically confirmed melanoma patients with proportion (P). VM+ melanoma cells were associated with poor prognosis in 38% of MM group (P = 0.35, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.27-0.42, p < 0.001). The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.82 (95% CI: 0.79-0.84) and 0.69 (95% CI: 0.66-0.71), respectively. Furthermore, the pooled PLR, NLR, and DOR were 2.56 (95% CI: 1.94-3.93), 0.17 (95% CI: 0.07-0.42), and 17.75 (95% CI: 5.30-59.44), respectively. Furthermore, the AUC of SROC was 0.63, indicating high reliability of VM status as a biomarker. Importantly, subgroup results suggested that VM+ status is a significantly accurate prognostic biomarker when diagnosed by the CD31-/PAS+ staining methods in Asian MM samples (p < 0.001).

conclusionsOur findings support the potential of VM status of tumors as a promising prognostic biomarker and emphasize an effective adjuvant therapeutic strategy in the prognosis of Asian MM patients.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansMaleMelanomaNeovascularization, PathologicObservational Studies as TopicOdds RatioPrognosisROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityDiagnosisMalignant melanomaMeta-analysisPrognosisVasculogenic mimicry

Identifiers

PMID31752759
PMCPMC6873453
OpenAlexW2990248558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.