Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31752535›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2020

Evaluation of Precision and Bias Specifications Required to Achieve the 2018 FDA Guidance Criteria for Glucose Meter Performance Using Simulation Models.

Andrew W Lyon, Martha E Lyon

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Strategies for optimization of hypoglycemia rat models.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew W LyonDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6975-815X
Martha E LyonDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Saskatchewan Health Authority, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4937-2943
Saskatchewan Health Authority · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of this study was to estimate the combinations of total bias and total imprecision required for devices to meet the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) specifications using Monte Carlo simulation rather than collection and analysis of experimental data.

methodsA model Gaussian distribution of true-glucose values was altered by adding bias and imprecision to create measured-glucose values affected by analytic error. The fraction of measured-glucose values that met the 2018 FDA criteria for blood glucose monitoring system (BGMS) or self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) devices was determined as a function of bias and imprecision.

resultsThe BGMS model determined that a maximum total imprecision of 6% was required with no bias, and with a total bias of +10 mg/dL the total imprecision allowed was reduced to 5% to achieve the 95% FDA performance expectation: 95% of results ≥75 mg/dL within ±12% and 95% of results <75 mg/dL within ±12 mg/dL. The SMBG model determined that a maximum total imprecision of 6% was required at no bias, and with a total bias of +10 mg/dL the total imprecision allowed was reduced to 4% to achieve the 98% FDA expectation: 98% of results ±75 mg/dL within ±15% and 98% of results <75 mg/dL within ±15 mg/dL.

conclusionsThe 2018 FDA guidance criteria require strict conditions for glucose meter clinical trials to achieve <10 mg/dL total bias and total imprecision of <5%. Total imprecision and bias values assessed in models in this study represent the cumulative imprecision and bias errors for the glucose meters, the reference method, and preanalytic processes.

Indexed as

Device ApprovalPoint-of-Care TestingUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationBiasBiomarkersBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringComputer SimulationEquipment DesignHumansMonte Carlo MethodPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsUnited StatesBiomarkersBlood Glucoseanalytic errorblood glucose monitoring systemFDA guidancePOCTpoint-of-care testingSMBG

Identifiers

PMID31752535
PMCPMC7576955
OpenAlexW2989854042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.