Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31752418›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Using Microbiological Sampling to Evaluate the Efficacy of Nasofibroscope Disinfection: The Tristel Trio Wipes System in Ear-Nose-Throat (ENT) Endoscopy.

Savina Ditommaso, Monica Giacomuzzi, Raffaella Cipriani, Teresa Zaccaria, Rossana Cavallo, Valeria Boggio, Roberto Albera, Carla M Zotti

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Time-effectiveness and convenience of transvaginal ultrasound probe disinfection using ultraviolet vs chlorine dioxide multistep wipe system: prospective survey study.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Savina DitommasoDepartment of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1590-9009
Monica GiacomuzziDepartment of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Raffaella CiprianiLaboratory of Microbiology and Virology, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Teresa ZaccariaLaboratory of Microbiology and Virology, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Rossana CavalloDepartment of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Laboratory of Microbiology and Virology, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Valeria BoggioDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Otolaryngology Unit, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Roberto AlberaDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Otolaryngology Unit, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Carla M ZottiDepartment of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy.
University of Turin · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disinfection and sterilization are needed for guaranteeing that medical and surgical instruments do not spread contagious microorganisms to patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a simple manual technique of high-level disinfection (HLD) of flexible fiberoptic nasofibroscopes (FFNs) with wipes impregnated with a chlorine dioxide solution (Tristel Trio Wipes System-TTW) against a conventional automated washer machine (Soluscope ENT, Cimrex 12-AW). FFNs used in 62 patients undergoing endoscopy at an ENT clinic were sampled according to an aseptic procedure. For each nasoendoscopy, microbiological samples were taken at two times: (1) after a patient's nasoendoscopy and (2) immediately after high-level disinfection. Ten microliters of each prepared sample were inoculated onto specific culture media for the detection of nasopharyngeal flora microorganisms. The microbiological results obtained from 62 post-disinfection samples revealed bacterial growth on two FFNs disinfected with AW, and five FFNs disinfected with TTW, but this difference is not statistically significant. None of the isolates were pathogenic bacteria. Our results are different than the results obtained by two previously published studies on the TTW system. In both studies, sampling was carried out by swabbing the tip and the handle surface of FFNs. This sampling method was the least effective method means of detecting bacteria on a surface. It can be concluded that the two disinfection systems allow providers to obtain a reduction of the saprophytic and pathogenic microbial load.

Indexed as

BacteriaChlorine CompoundsDisinfectantsDisinfectionEndoscopesEquipment ContaminationHumansOxidesSpecimen HandlingChlorine Compoundschlorine dioxideDisinfectantsOxidesdisinfectionflexible fiberoptic laryngoscopesamplingwipes

Identifiers

PMID31752418
PMCPMC6887787
OpenAlexW2990833501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.