ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2019
Pharmaceutical Aspects of Artificial Nutrition.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging the Gap in the Clinical Application of Advanced Parenteral Nutrition Formulations: From Efficacy to Real-World Challenges.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Review
- Parenteral nutrition in clinical practice: International challenges and strategies.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2024Review
- Parenteral nutrition at home/long-term parenteral nutrition.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2024Review
- Expert consensus statements and summary of proceedings from the International Safety and Quality of Parenteral Nutrition Summit.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2024Article
- Use of Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) as a Vehicle for Drug Delivery.Current drug targets · 2024Review
- A Narrative Review: Analysis of Supplemental Parenteral Nutrition in Adults at the End of Life.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Clinical Nutrition in Portuguese Gastroenterology Departments: A Multicentric Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Effects of fish oil-containing nutrition supplementation in adult sepsis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Burns & trauma · 2022Article
- Management of Hyperglycemia in Hospitalized Patients Receiving Parenteral Nutrition.Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2022Review
- Manipulations of Oral Medications in Paediatric Neurology and Oncology Care at a Swedish University Hospital: Health Professionals' Attitudes and Sources of Information.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
- Physicochemical Stability and Compatibility Testing of Voriconazole in All-in-One Parenteral Nutrition Admixtures.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
- Article
- Co-Administration of Drugs and Parenteral Nutrition: In Vitro Compatibility Studies of Loop Diuretics for Safer Clinical Practice.Pharmaceutics · 2020Article
- Nutritional Management of Patients With Enterocutaneous Fistulas: Practice and Progression.Frontiers in nutrition · 2020Review
- Nutritional Management and Outcomes in Malnourished Medical Inpatients in 2020: The Evidence Is Growing!Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial nutrition, including enteral (EN) and parenteral (PN) nutrition, is indicated whenever adequate oral nutrition fails to sufficiently supply the necessary nutrients to the body. It is a convenient, efficacious, safe, and well-tolerated form of clinical nutrition in the hospital and home setting. EN is administered via nasogastric tube or ostomies while PN usually requires a central venous access for administration, straight into the blood stream. The infused nutrients can then be taken up directly by the different organs. PN is targeted as a single daily portion formulated as an oil-in-water emulsion providing the necessary substrates for the catabolic and anabolic metabolism including macro- and micronutrients and fluids. PN has a complex pharmaceutical composition-all-in-one admixture-and its compounding or ready-to-use preparation. The use of PN is more challenging and more expensive compare to the use of EN, commercially available as ready-to-use formulations. EN and concomitant medication is highly challenging. Upon incorrect handling and administration, PN is associated with potentially severe or even fatal complications, mostly relating to the central venous access (e.g., catheter-related sepsis) or to a metabolic intolerance (e.g., hyperglycemia, refeeding syndrome) because of inappropriate administration. A correct order of admixing, correct dosing, and administration of the artificial is crucial for safety and efficacy; clinical and biochemical monitoring of the patient and treatment regimen adaption are necessary. The high number of reactive solutes allow only limited stability of a ready-to-use PN admixture. The potential for numerous incompatibilities and interactions renders PN admixtures generally unsuitable as drug vehicle. Laboratory compatibility and stability testing and pharmaceutical expertise are a prerequisite to define the PN composition including nutrients or even drugs admixed to define the appropriate and individualized nutrition and medication regimen. The aim of this narrative review is to present the actual state-of-the-art to deliver best quality artificial nutrition with special regard on pharmaceutical aspects such as instabilities, incompatibilities, and concomitant co-medication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.