Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31752210›Full record

ArticleToxins2019

Missiles of Mass Disruption: Composition and Glandular Origin of Venom Used as a Projectile Defensive Weapon by the Assassin Bug

Andrew A Walker, Samuel D Robinson, Eivind A B Undheim, Jiayi Jin, Xiao Han, Bryan G Fry, Irina Vetter, Glenn F King

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxins, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Armed stem to stinger: a review of the ecological roles of scorpion weapons.The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2021
    Review
  15. An Integrative Sialomic Analysis Reveals Molecules FromFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrew A WalkerInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, the University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Samuel D RobinsonInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, the University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Eivind A B UndheimInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, the University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Jiayi JinInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, the University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Xiao HanInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, the University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Bryan G FryVenom Evolution Lab, School of Biological Sciences, the University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Irina VetterInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, the University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.
Glenn F KingInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, the University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assassin bugs (Reduviidae) produce venoms that are insecticidal, and which induce pain in predators, but the composition and function of their individual venom components is poorly understood. We report findings on the venom system of the red-spotted assassin bug

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsArthropod VenomsHeteropteraSequence Analysis, RNASequence Homology, Amino AcidTranscriptomeArthropod Venomsinsecticidalinsect venompacifastinpainpropelled venomReduviidae

Identifiers

PMID31752210
PMCPMC6891600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.