ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2020
Evaluation of Commercial Next-Generation Sequencing Bioinformatics Software Solutions.
Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular techniques in haematopathology: what and how?Histopathology · 2025Review
- Diagnosis of Mosaic Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Using Next-Generation Sequencing of Subtle or Unusual Cutaneous Findings.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2023Article
- Bioinformatics: From NGS Data to Biological Complexity in Variant Detection and Oncological Clinical Practice.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- MTPpilot: An Interactive Software for Visualization of Next-Generation Sequencing Results in Molecular Tumor Boards.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2022Article
- Identifying the Steps Required to Effectively Implement Next-Generation Sequencing in Oncology at a National Level in Europe.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- NEMHESYS-European Perspective on the Implementation of Next-generation Sequencing Into Clinical Diagnostics.HemaSphere · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) diagnostics continue to expand rapidly in clinical medicine. An ever-expanding menu of molecular biomarkers is deemed important for diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic assessment in patients. The increasing role of NGS in the clinic is driven mainly by the falling costs of sequencing. However, the data-intensive nature of NGS makes bioinformatic analysis a major challenge to many clinical laboratories. Critically needed NGS bioinformatics personnel are hard to recruit and retain in small- to mid-size clinical laboratories. Also, NGS software often lacks the scalability necessary for expanded clinical laboratory testing volumes. Commercial software solutions aim to bridge the bioinformatics barrier via turnkey informatics solutions tailored specifically for the clinical workplace. Yet, there has been no systematic assessment of these software solutions thus far. This article presents an end-to-end vendor evaluation experience of commercial NGS bioinformatics solutions. Six different commercial vendor solutions were assessed systematically. Key metrics of NGS software evaluation to aid in the robust assessment of software solutions are described. Comprehensive feedback, provided by the TriCore Reference Laboratories molecular pathology team, enabled the final vendor selection. Many key lessons were learned during the software evaluation process, which are described herein. This article aims to provide a detailed road map for small- to mid-size clinical laboratories interested in evaluating commercial bioinformatics solutions available in the marketplace.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.