Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31751373›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Health provider and service-user experiences of sensory modulation rooms in an acute inpatient psychiatry setting.

Skye P Barbic, Nicole Chan, Amanpreet Rangi, James Bradley, Rachal Pattison, Kerri Brockmeyer, Sandy Leznoff, Yojo Smolski, Gagan Toor, Blaine Bray and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07533669 (The Effect of a Sensory Modulation Room Applied in the Preoperative Period on Pain, Anxiety, and Sleep in Kidney Transplantation), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07533669 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of a Sensory Modulation Room Applied in the Preoperative Period on Pain, Anxiety, and Sleep in Kidney Transplantation: An Innovative Nursing Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorSakarya UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsRenal Transplantation, Transplant Donation, Donor NephrectomyArmsPreoperative Sensory Modulation Session
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Skye P BarbicFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7076-2452
Nicole ChanFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Amanpreet RangiFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
James BradleyProvidence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Rachal PattisonFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Kerri BrockmeyerProvidence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Sandy LeznoffProvidence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Yojo SmolskiProvidence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Gagan ToorProvidence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Blaine BrayProvidence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Adelena LeonFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Malcolm JenkinsProvidence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Steve MathiasProvidence Health Care, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Providence Health Care · CAUniversity of British Columbia Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSensory modulation rooms (SMRs) are therapeutic spaces that use sensory modulation concepts and strategies to assist service users to self-regulate and modulate arousal levels. SMRs are increasingly being explored as strength-based and person-centered adjuncts to care for people receiving inpatient psychiatry services. The aim of this study is to understand health provider and inpatient service user perceptions on the use of SMRs on acute psychiatric units.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with ten service users and nine health providers (four occupational therapists and five nurses) regarding their experiences of the SMRs located on three acute inpatient units in a large urban tertiary care hospital. We audio recorded and transcribed the focus groups and used thematic analysis to analyze the data.

resultsOur results suggested four common themes amongst health provider and service user experiences of sensory modulation rooms: (1) service user empowerment through self-management, (2) emotional regulation, (3) an alternative to current practices, and (4) health provider and service user education.

conclusionOur study supports the ecological utility of SMRs as person-centred adjunct therapeutic space viewed positively by both service users and health providers. This understanding of SMRs is critical for future service design, research and policy aimed at improving the service user experience and care for this population. Future research is needed to validate the experience of the SMRs with other patient groups and health providers.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelMental Health ServicesAcute DiseaseAdultAgedEmotionsFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPublic Health SurveillanceSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31751373
PMCPMC6874072
OpenAlexW2989795025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.