ArticleIEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society2019
Phase asymmetry ultrasound despeckling with fractional anisotropic diffusion and total variation.
Article in IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Improved right ventricular strain estimation in rats using anisotropic diffusion filtering.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2023Article
- Despeckling and enhancement of ultrasound images using non-local variational framework.The Visual computer · 2022Article
- Comparative analysis of wavelet transform filtering systems for noise reduction in ultrasound images.PloS one · 2022Article
- Sequential vessel segmentation via deep channel attention network.Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We propose an ultrasound speckle filtering method for not only preserving various edge features but also filtering tissue-dependent complex speckle noises in ultrasound images. The key idea is to detect these various edges using a phase congruence-based edge significance measure called phase asymmetry (PAS), which is invariant to the intensity amplitude of edges and takes 0 in non-edge smooth regions and 1 at the idea step edge, while also taking intermediate values at slowly varying ramp edges. By leveraging the PAS metric in designing weighting coefficients to maintain a balance between fractional-order anisotropic diffusion and total variation (TV) filters in TV cost function, we propose a new fractional TV framework to not only achieve the best despeckling performance with ramp edge preservation but also reduce the staircase effect produced by integral-order filters. Then, we exploit the PAS metric in designing a new fractional-order diffusion coefficient to properly preserve low-contrast edges in diffusion filtering. Finally, different from fixed fractional-order diffusion filters, an adaptive fractional order is introduced based on the PAS metric to enhance various weak edges in the spatially transitional areas between objects. The proposed fractional TV model is minimized using the gradient descent method to obtain the final denoised image. The experimental results and real application of ultrasound breast image segmentation show that the proposed method outperforms other state-of-the-art ultrasound despeckling filters for both speckle reduction and feature preservation in terms of visual evaluation and quantitative indices. The best scores on feature similarity indices have achieved 0.867, 0.844 and 0.834 under three different levels of noise, while the best breast ultrasound segmentation accuracy in terms of the mean and median dice similarity coefficient are 96.25% and 96.15%, respectively.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.