Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31751165›Full record

ReviewPhysiological reviews2020

Stiffness Sensing by Cells.

Paul A Janmey, Daniel A Fletcher, Cynthia A Reinhart-King

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiological reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 213 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
213citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

213 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Chemical and Mechanical Regulation of Leukocyte Migration.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Mechanomedicine.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

153 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paul A JanmeyDepartment of Physiology, Institute for Medicine and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Bioengineering, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, California; and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Daniel A FletcherDepartment of Physiology, Institute for Medicine and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Bioengineering, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, California; and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Cynthia A Reinhart-KingDepartment of Physiology, Institute for Medicine and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Bioengineering, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, California; and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.

Funding

Structural basis of the specific protein-protein interactions underlying IF assemP01GM096971 · NIGMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GOLDMAN, ROBERT D · 2011 to 2021
$16.8M
Regulation of cell, tissue, and nucleus function by mechanical properties of biopolymer networksR35GM136259 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Paul A Janmey · 2020 to 2026
$3.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM096971NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical stimuli are essential for the function of eukaryotic cells, and changes in physical signals are important elements in normal tissue development as well as in disease initiation and progression. The complexity of physical stimuli and the cellular signals they initiate are as complex as those triggered by chemical signals. One of the most important, and the focus of this review, is the effect of substrate mechanical properties on cell structure and function. The past decade has produced a nearly exponentially increasing number of mechanobiological studies to define how substrate stiffness alters cell biology using both purified systems and intact tissues. Here we attempt to identify common features of mechanosensing in different systems while also highlighting the numerous informative exceptions to what in early studies appeared to be simple rules by which cells respond to mechanical stresses.

Indexed as

Cellular MicroenvironmentMechanotransduction, CellularAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell MovementCell ProliferationCell ShapeElasticityHumansViscositycell mechanicscytoskeletonmechanobiologymechanotransductionsubstrate stiffnesstissue mechanicsviscoelasticity

Identifiers

PMID31751165
PMCPMC7276923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.