Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31750870›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2020

Eligibility and Radiologic Assessment for Adjuvant Clinical Trials in Kidney Cancer.

Sundeep Agrawal, Naomi B Haas, Mohammadhadi Bagheri, Brian R Lane, Jonathan Coleman, Hans Hammers, Gennady Bratslavsky, Cynthia Chauhan, Lauren Kim, Venkatesh P Krishnasamy and 13 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Sundeep AgrawalCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Naomi B HaasAbramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Mohammadhadi BagheriCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Brian R LaneSpectrum Health Cancer Center, Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Jonathan ColemanMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Hans HammersUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Gennady BratslavskyDepartment of Urology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York.
Cynthia ChauhanHeart Failure Society of America, Rockville, Maryland.
Lauren KimCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Venkatesh P KrishnasamyCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Jamie MarkoCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Virginia Ellen MaherCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Amna IbrahimCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Frank CrossCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Ke LiuCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Maryland.
Julia A BeaverCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Richard PazdurOncology Center of Excellence, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Gideon M BlumenthalOncology Center of Excellence, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Harpreet SinghCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.
Elizabeth R PlimackFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Toni K ChoueiriDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Robert UzzoFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Andrea B ApoloCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research · USNational Institutes of Health · USFox Chase Cancer Center · USNational Cancer Institute · USUnited States Food and Drug Administration · USAbramson Cancer CenterCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research · USCorewell Health Blodgett Hospital · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USHeart Valve Society of America · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USSUNY Upstate Medical University · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Bladder Cancer ProgramZIABC011351 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI APOLO, ANDREA · 2010 to 2025
$9.4M
Rare GU tumors projectsZIABC011928 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI APOLO, ANDREA · 2019 to 2025
$4.6M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011351Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011928NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo harmonize the eligibility criteria and radiologic disease assessment definitions in clinical trials of adjuvant therapy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

methodOn November 28, 2017, US-based experts in RCC clinical trials, including medical oncologists, urologic oncologists, regulators, biostatisticians, radiologists, and patient advocates, convened at a public workshop to discuss eligibility for trial entry and radiologic criteria for assessing disease recurrence in adjuvant trials in RCC. Multiple virtual meetings were conducted to address the issues identified at the workshop.

resultsThe key workshop conclusions for adjuvant RCC therapy clinical trials were as follows. First, patients with non-clear cell RCC could be routinely included, preferably in an independent cohort. Second, patients with T3-4, N+M0, and microscopic R1 RCC tumors may gain the greatest advantages from adjuvant therapy. Third, trials of agents not excreted by the kidney should not exclude patients with severe renal insufficiency. Fourth, therapy can begin 4 to 16 weeks after the surgical procedure. Fifth, patients undergoing radical or partial nephrectomy should be equally eligible. Sixth, patients with microscopically positive soft tissue or vascular margins without gross residual or radiologic disease may be included in trials. Seventh, all suspicious regional lymph nodes should be fully resected. Eighth, computed tomography should be performed within 4 weeks before trial enrollment; for patients with renal insufficiency who cannot undergo computed tomography with contrast, noncontrast chest computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen and pelvis with gadolinium should be performed. Ninth, when feasible, biopsy should be undertaken to identify any malignant disease. Tenth, when biopsy is not feasible, a uniform approach should be used to evaluate indeterminate radiologic findings to identify what constitutes no evidence of disease at trial entry and what constitutes radiologic evidence of disease. Eleventh, a uniform approach for establishing the date of recurrence should be included in any trial design. Twelfth, patient perspectives on the use of placebo, conditions for unblinding, and research biopsies should be considered carefully during the conduct of an adjuvant trial. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The discussions suggested that a uniform approach to eligibility criteria and radiologic disease assessment will lead to more consistently interpretable trial results in the adjuvant RCC therapy setting.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsClinical Trials as TopicHumansMargins of ExcisionNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNephrectomy

Identifiers

PMID31750870
PMCPMC8127869
OpenAlexW2990024647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.