Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31750834›Full record

ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2019

Effectiveness of the Volunteer Family Connect Program in Reducing Isolation of Vulnerable Families and Supporting Their Parenting: Randomized Controlled Trial With Intention-To-Treat Analysis of Primary Outcome Variables.

Rebekah Grace, Kelly Baird, Emma Elcombe, Vana Webster, Jacqueline Barnes, Lynn Kemp

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rebekah Grace *Translational Research and Social Innovation, Western Sydney University, Liverpool, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7812-8077
Kelly Baird *Translational Research and Social Innovation, Western Sydney University, Liverpool, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3934-5084
Emma Elcombe *Translational Research and Social Innovation, Western Sydney University, Liverpool, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1829-9093
Vana Webster *Translational Research and Social Innovation, Western Sydney University, Liverpool, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4725-9242
Jacqueline Barnes *Institute for the Study of Children, Families and Social Issues, Birkbeck University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5566-8997
Lynn Kemp *Translational Research and Social Innovation, Western Sydney University, Liverpool, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0348-1837
Translational Research Institute · AUBirkbeck, University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVolunteer home visiting is a widely adopted community-based approach to support families by linking isolated or vulnerable families with community volunteers who visit their homes weekly over approximately 12 months. This study seeks to robustly evaluate the effectiveness of this model of support for families with young children.

objectiveThis paper reports the intention-to-treat analysis of primary and secondary outcomes for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the Volunteer Family Connect intervention, a volunteer home-visiting program designed to support families with young children who experience social isolation or a lack of parenting confidence and skills.

methodsThe RCT was conducted across seven sites in Australia. Overall, 341 families were recruited: 169 intervention (services as usual+volunteer home visits) and 172 control (services as usual) families. Intervention families received the program for 3-12 months. Participants were invited to complete six data collection points over a 15-month period. Primary outcomes were community connectedness and parenting competence. Secondary outcomes included parent physical and mental health, general parent wellbeing, parent empowerment, the sustainability of family routines, and the parent-child relationship. According to the protocol, the program would be judged to be effective if at least one of the primary outcomes was significantly positive and the other was neutral (ie, intervention families did not demonstrate positive or negative outcomes compared to the control group).

resultsThe intervention group demonstrated significant improvement in the primary outcome variable parenting sense of competence as compared to the control group. Overall, there was no significant difference between the intervention and control groups with regard to the primary outcome variable community connectedness, other than on the "Guidance" subscale of the Social Provisions Scale. Because there were statistically significant findings for the total score of one primary outcome variable "parenting sense of competence" and largely neutral findings for the primary outcome variable "community connectedness," the program met the previously defined criteria for program effectiveness. In relation to secondary outcomes, intervention families reported significantly higher wellbeing and were significantly more likely to feel that life was improving.

conclusionsThe Volunteer Family Connect intervention was considered an effective intervention, with a role to play on the landscape of services available to support vulnerable families with young children.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN12616000396426; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=370304.

Indexed as

communityfamiliesrandomized controlled trialsocial relationshipssupport servicesVolunteer Family Connectvolunteer home visiting

Identifiers

PMID31750834
PMCPMC6895872
OpenAlexW2963391123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.