Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31750831›Full record

ArticleeLife2019

A projection specific logic to sampling visual inputs in mouse superior colliculus.

Katja Reinhard, Chen Li, Quan Do, Emily G Burke, Steven Heynderickx, Karl Farrow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Absence of local retinotopy in the mouse optic tract.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Behavioral Modulation and Molecular Definition of Wide-Field Vertical Cells in the Mouse Superior Colliculus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Inner Structure of the Lateral Geniculate Complex of Adult and NewbornInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  18. The Molecular Logic of Synaptic Specificity in the Retinocollicular Pathway.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  19. Predation without direction selectivity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katja Reinhard *Neuro-Electronics Research Flanders, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8719-7445
Chen Li *Neuro-Electronics Research Flanders, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5117-986X
Quan DoNeuro-Electronics Research Flanders, Leuven, Belgium.
Emily G BurkeNeuro-Electronics Research Flanders, Leuven, Belgium.
Steven HeynderickxNeuro-Electronics Research Flanders, Leuven, Belgium.
Karl FarrowNeuro-Electronics Research Flanders, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1409-096X

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek G094616NFP7 People: Marie-Curie Actions 631909H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions [PEGASUS]² Marie Skłodowska-Curie Fellowship 12S7917N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using sensory information to trigger different behaviors relies on circuits that pass through brain regions. The rules by which parallel inputs are routed to downstream targets are poorly understood. The superior colliculus mediates a set of innate behaviors, receiving input from >30 retinal ganglion cell types and projecting to behaviorally important targets including the pulvinar and parabigeminal nucleus. Combining transsynaptic circuit tracing with in vivo and ex vivo electrophysiological recordings, we observed a projection-specific logic where each collicular output pathway sampled a distinct set of retinal inputs. Neurons projecting to the pulvinar or the parabigeminal nucleus showed strongly biased sampling from four cell types each, while six others innervated both pathways. The visual response properties of retinal ganglion cells correlated well with those of their disynaptic targets. These findings open the possibility that projection-specific sampling of retinal inputs forms a basis for the selective triggering of behaviors by the superior colliculus.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalInstinctAnimalsElectroencephalographyMiceModels, NeurologicalNeuroanatomical Tract-Tracing TechniquesPulvinarRetinal Ganglion CellsSuperior ColliculiVisual Pathwaysmouseneuroscienceparabigeminal nucleuspulvinarretinasuperior colliculusvisual circuits

Identifiers

PMID31750831
PMCPMC6872211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.