ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance2019
Talker-specific pronunciation or speech error? Discounting (or not) atypical pronunciations during speech perception.
Article in Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- When Jack isn't Jacques: Simultaneous opposite language-specific speech perceptual learning in French-English bilinguals.PNAS nexus · 2024Article
- Influence of face masks on recalibration of phonetic categories.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023Article
- Bad maps may not always get you lost: Lexically driven perceptual recalibration for substituted phonemes.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023Article
- Perceptual learning of multiple talkers: Determinants, characteristics, and limitations.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2022Article
- Cross-talker generalization in the perception of nonnative speech: A large-scale replication.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2021Article
- A second chance for a first impression: Sensitivity to cumulative input statistics for lexically guided perceptual learning.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2021Article
- Individual Differences in Lexical Contributions to Speech Perception.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Perceptual recalibration allows listeners to adapt to talker-specific pronunciations, such as atypical realizations of specific sounds. Such recalibration can facilitate robust speech recognition. However, indiscriminate recalibration following any atypically pronounced words also risks interpreting pronunciations as characteristic of a talker that are in reality because of incidental, short-lived factors (such as a speech error). We investigate whether the mechanisms underlying perceptual recalibration involve inferences about the causes for unexpected pronunciations. In 5 experiments, we ask whether perceptual recalibration is blocked if the atypical pronunciations of an unfamiliar talker can also be attributed to other incidental causes. We investigated 3 type of incidental causes for atypical pronunciations: the talker is intoxicated, the talker speaks unusually fast, or the atypical pronunciations occur only in the context of tongue twisters. In all 5 experiments, we find robust evidence for perceptual recalibration, but little evidence that the presence of incidental causes block perceptual recalibration. We discuss these results in light of other recent findings that incidental causes can block perceptual recalibration. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.