Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31750393›Full record

ArticleJournal of environment and health sciences2019

Putting Action into Population Health Science: Primary Care Interventions to Address Social Determinants of Health.

Steven S Coughlin, Joseph Hobbs, Pam Cromer, Varghese George, Christos Hatzigeorgiou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of environment and health sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Steven S CoughlinDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA.
Joseph HobbsDepartment of Family Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA.
Pam CromerCollege of Nursing, Augusta University, Augusta, GA.
Varghese GeorgeDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA.
Christos HatzigeorgiouDivision of General Internal Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA.

Funding

EPIDEMIOLOGY OF IDIOPATHIC DILATED CARDIOMYOPATHYR29HL044904 · NHLBI · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI COUGHLIN, STEVEN S · 1990 to 1994
–
NHLBI NIH HHS R29 HL044904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concern about health equity and social determinants of illness (e.g., income inequalities, lack of education, food insecurity) figure prominently in many conceptions of population health. In order to illustrate how population health can actively translate science into action, we consider primary care interventions that promote healthy populations by addressing the social determinants of health. In the examples provided in this article, primary care and population health are linked in a way that reinforces each other, and these innovative interventions may lead to improved health outcomes. Population health science provides a variety of methods and approaches for designing and evaluating interventions that aim to link patients with community resources that can address social determinants of health and improve the quality of their lives. Population health can serve as an important bridge between primary care and the public health sector. Population health science has been defined as "the study of the conditions that shape distributions of health within and across populations, and of the mechanisms through which these conditions manifest as the health of individuals" (Keys, K.M. 2016). According to this perspective, population health science elucidates the mechanisms that produce disease and the discipline of public health then applies that information to promote health in populations. Put another way, population health can be seen as the basic science of public health (Galea, S., et al. 2018). Other conceptions of population health have a direct concern with the translation of science into actions, and view science and action as linked and reinforcing each other (Kindig, D., et al. 2003; Diez Roux, A.V, 2016). For example, Kindig & Stoddart (2003) differentiated population health from public health, health promotion, and social epidemiology and argued that "the field of population health includes health outcomes, patterns of health determinants, and policies and interventions that link these two." The thesis of this commentary is that population health science goes beyond studying the mechanisms that shape distributions within and across populations to include actions that promote health of the entire human population. In support of this thesis, examples are provided from the literature on interventions in primary care that promote healthy populations by addressing the social determinants of health.

Identifiers

PMID31750393
PMCPMC6866229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.