Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31750079›Full record

ArticleAnnals of global health2019

Bending the Arc towards Equitable Partnerships in Global Health and Applied Training.

Nina A Martin, Anna Kalbarczyk, Emily Nagourney, Abigail Reich, Bhakti Hansoti, Andrew Kambugu, Thomas C Quinn, Yukari C Manabe, Barbara Castelnuovo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of global health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Bilateral trauma case conferences: an approach to global surgery equity through a virtual education exchange.Global surgical education : journal of the Association for Surgical Education · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nina A MartinJohns Hopkins Center for Global Health, Baltimore, MD, US.
Anna KalbarczykJohns Hopkins Center for Global Health, Baltimore, MD, US.
Emily NagourneyJohns Hopkins Center for Global Health, Baltimore, MD, US.
Abigail ReichJohns Hopkins Center for Global Health, Baltimore, MD, US.
Bhakti HansotiJohns Hopkins Center for Global Health, Baltimore, MD, US.
Andrew KambuguInfectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, UG.
Thomas C QuinnJohns Hopkins Center for Global Health, Baltimore, MD, US.
Yukari C ManabeJohns Hopkins Center for Global Health, Baltimore, MD, US.
Barbara CastelnuovoInfectious Diseases Institute, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, UG.

Funding

NURTURE:Research Training and Mentoring Program for Career Development of Faculty at Makerere University College of Health SciencesD43TW010132 · FIC · MAKERERE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SEWANKAMBO, NELSON K · 2015 to 2019
$4.3M
HIV Co-infections in Uganda: TB, Cryptococcus, and Viral Hepatitis.D43TW009771 · FIC · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CASTELNUOVO, BARBARA, KAMBUGU, ANDREW DDUNGU · 2014 to 2023
$3.3M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009771FIC NIH HHS D43 TW010132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Global health education has rapidly expanded in popularity, and many programs require applied practical experiences. Applied experiences are critical for global health training. Often a trainee from a high-income country travels to work with collaborators and partners in a low- or middle-income country. These experiences exist within partnerships between individuals and institutions that have varying objectives, including research, program implementation, or education. Attention is growing to ensure equity in these relationships in ways that are informed by the voices of collaborators and partners. Objectives: Understanding the experiences of LMIC collaborators in academic global health partnerships is essential. Our research aimed to capture views of our partners about factors impacting equitable global health partnerships. Methods: We conducted a small survey among global health collaborators and partners who host students on these experiences. Respondents were asked to rank enablers and barriers to equitable partnerships in priority order. Results were stratified by institutional affiliation and role. Results: Funding, time, engagement, and mutual opportunities for training are common enablers and barriers of global health partnerships. There were slight differences across different professional roles. Other reported factors that impact partnerships included language barriers, visa concerns, and identifying opportunities for collaboration. Conclusions: Our work highlights several barriers and enablers faced by partners that align with those reported across the global health education community. Equitable partnerships are possible and require substantial input at individual, interpersonal, and institutional levels. We reflect on two strategies to encourage partnership equity employed within our own work and discuss how these strategies can be applied more broadly.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchDeveloping CountriesInternational CooperationAcademies and InstitutesFaculty, MedicalGlobal HealthHumansInternational Educational ExchangeOrganizationsResearch Support as TopicTime FactorsTraining SupportUnited StatesUniversities

Identifiers

PMID31750079
PMCPMC6838765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.