Article3 Biotech2019
Analysis of high-throughput sequencing for cecal microbiota diversity and function in hens under different rearing systems.
Article in 3 Biotech, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- The chicken gut microbiome in conventional and alternative production systems.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Rearing system and immune status influence the small intestinal microbiota of IPB-D3 chickens: A full-length 16S rRNA metagenomic approach.Veterinary world · 2025Article
- Species and functional composition of cecal microbiota and resistance gene diversity in different Yunnan native chicken breeds: A metagenomic analysis.Poultry science · 2025Article
- Characterization and Evaluation ofJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Dietary low levels ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Effects of rearing systems (cage versus floor) on the microbial composition and transcriptome of goose ileum.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Insights into the gut microbiota characteristics between the organic and traditional feeding chickens based on amplicon and metagenomic sequencing.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Effects of Different-Sized Cages on the Production Performance, Serum Parameters, and Caecal Microbiota Composition of Laying Hens.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Effects of rearing system and antibiotic treatment on immune function, gut microbiota and metabolites of broiler chickens.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Poor body condition is associated with lower hippocampal plasticity and higher gut methanogen abundance in adult laying hens from two housing systems.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Changes in phosphorus mobilization and community assembly of bacterial and fungal communities in rice rhizosphere under phosphate deficiency.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Caecal microbial communities, functional diversity, and metabolic pathways in Ross 308 broiler chickens fed with diets containing different levels of Marama (Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- An Outdoor Access Period Improves Chicken Cecal Microbiota and Potentially Increases Micronutrient Biosynthesis.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- Heterophil/Lymphocyte Ratio Level ModulatesFrontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Functional enrichment of gut microbiome by early supplementation of Bacillus based probiotic in cage free hens: a field study.Animal microbiome · 2021Article
- Different Non-cage Housing Systems Alter Duodenal and Cecal Microbiota Composition in Shendan Chickens.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021Article
- Metagenomic analysis reveals linkages between cecal microbiota and feed efficiency in Xiayan chickens.Poultry science · 2020Article
- Effects of cage type on performance, welfare, and microbiological properties of laying hens during the molting period and the second production cycle.Tropical animal health and production · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rearing systems play an important role in animal welfare, health and the composition of the gut microbiome. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of different rearing systems on the composition and function of cecal microbiota in chickens. The 120-day-old Lohmann hens of cage rearing systems (CRS) and free-range systems (FRS) were studied. The cecal bacterial populations of hens were surveyed by high-throughput sequencing (HTS) of the bacterial 16S rRNA hypervariable region V3-V4 combined with metagenomic sequencing analysis. The 16S rRNA sequencing analysis showed that the cecal microbiota differed between the FRS and CRS. The three most abundant bacteria phyla in the two systems were the Bacteroidetes (> 48%), Firmicutes (> 37%), and Proteobacteria (> 6%), the Deferribacteres (> 2.4%) were found in FRS and almost absent in CRS (< 0.01%). The three most abundant genera were the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.