ArticleMRS communications2019
Towards the directed evolution of protein materials.
Article in MRS communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cell-in-Bead-in-Droplet Platform for pH-Based Microfluidic Screening of Ureolytic Bacteria.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Synthetic phosphoethanolamine-modified oligosaccharides reveal the importance of glycan length and substitution in biofilm-inspired assemblies.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Intelligent host engineering for metabolic flux optimisation in biotechnology.The Biochemical journal · 2021Review
- The Natural History of Integrons.Microorganisms · 2021Review
- Synthetic biology as driver for the biologization of materials sciences.Materials today. Bio · 2021Review
- Engineering controllable biofilms for biotechnological applications.Microbial biotechnology · 2021Article
- Non-covalent protein-based adhesives for transparent substrates-bovine serum albumin vs. recombinant spider silk.Materials today. Bio · 2020Article
- Towards engineering and production of artificial spider silk using tools of synthetic biology.Engineering biology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein-based materials have emerged as a powerful instrument for a new generation of biological materials, with many chemical and mechanical capabilities. Through the manipulation of DNA, researchers can design proteins at the molecular level, engineering a vast array of structural building blocks. However, our capability to rationally design and predict the properties of such materials is limited by the vastness of possible sequence space. Directed evolution has emerged as a powerful tool to improve biological systems through mutation and selection, presenting another avenue to produce novel protein materials. In this prospective review, we discuss the application of directed evolution for protein materials, reviewing current examples and developments that could facilitate the evolution of protein for material applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.