Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31750008›Full record

ArticleInnovations in pharmacy2018

Engaging with In-need Rural Patient Populations through Public Health Partnerships.

Wes Nuffer, Tara Trujillo, Christy Harmon, Megan Thompson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Innovations in pharmacy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wes NufferUniversity of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Tara TrujilloColorado Department of Public Health and Environment.
Christy HarmonUniversity of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Megan ThompsonUniversity of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences.

Funding

TO PREVENT & CONTROL AND PROMOTE SCHOOL HEALTHU58DP004796 · DP · COLORADO STATE DEPT/PUB HLTH & ENVIRONMT · PI KAPLAN, GABRIEL E · 2013 to 2014
$4.0M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U58 DP004796
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A public health partnership was established between a state Medicare Regional Care Collaborative Organization (RCCO), the state health department, a pharmacy school and three community pharmacies located in rural Colorado to optimize the utilization of a free public health service provided through each pharmacy. Fourth-year pharmacy students were allocated year-round by the University of Colorado to support disease management and medication therapy management (MTM) services offered to patients in three rural towns served by the RCCO. Faculty from the school of pharmacy reviewed data provided by the RCCO to identify patients who could benefit from MTM or disease state management (DSM) services. These patients were contacted and encouraged to take advantage of these free pharmacy-based services. Additionally, a number of targeted interventions were performed within these populations to optimize their health. Concerted efforts were made to improve information flow and communication between these pharmacy sites and partnering medical offices. Additionally, pharmacy students were successfully integrated in to medical offices to work alongside medical providers in these communities. This manuscript describes the implementation and coordination of this project as well as the impact these pharmacies had on the communities they served.

Indexed as

academic-community partnershipcommunity pharmacyhealth departmentMedicaremedication therapy managementpharmacy educationpharmacy studentpublic healthRCCO

Identifiers

PMID31750008
PMCPMC6438552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.