ReviewBMJ global health2019
Building operational public health capacity through collaborative networks of National Public Health Institutes.
Review in BMJ global health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Strengthening national public health institutes: a systematic review on institution building in the public sector.Frontiers in public health · 2023Pooled it
- National Public Health Institutes in Africa, 2010-2025: pathways, governance, and outcomes, a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Strengthening National Public Health Institutes for resilient health systems: evidence to inform policy and decision makers in the Eastern Mediterranean region.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- The impact of public leadership on collaborative administration and public health delivery.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Lessons learned during the establishment of a functional National Public Health Institute in the Democratic Republic of Congo: from 2018 to 2024.The Pan African medical journal · 2024Article
- The challenges of international collaboration in conflict and health research: experience from the Research for Health in Conflict-Middle East and North Africa (R4HC-MENA) partnership.Conflict and health · 2023Article
- Essential public health functions are not enough: fostering linkages between functions through National Public Health Institutes improves public health impact.BMJ global health · 2023Review
- Article
- Exploring the social value of Public Health Institutes: An international scoping survey and expert interviews.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Building the evidence base for global health policy: the need to strengthen institutional networks, geographical representation and global collaboration.BMJ global health · 2021Review
- Using health impact assessment (HIA) to understand the wider health and well-being implications of policy decisions: the COVID-19 'staying at home and social distancing policy' in Wales.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Using critical information to strengthen pandemic preparedness: the role of national public health agencies.BMJ global health · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The strengthening of public health systems internationally is integral to the improvement and protection of global population health. Essential public health functions and services are provided for by a range of organisations working together, often co-ordinated and strategically led by national Ministries of Health. Increasingly, however, National Public Health Institutes (NPHIs) are being developed to better integrate and support the delivery of these services. In this paper, we outline the role of NPHIs, analyse their advantages and shortcomings, and explore their potential to deliver enhanced public health through collaborative networking as well as partnership with WHO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.