Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31749962›Full record

GuidelineAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2019

APSIC guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infections.

Moi Lin Ling, Anucha Apisarnthanarak, Azlina Abbas, Keita Morikane, Kil Yeon Lee, Anup Warrier, Koji Yamada

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Moi Lin Ling1Infection Prevention & Epidemiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, 169608 Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-7110-4398
Anucha Apisarnthanarak2Infectious Diseases, Division of Infectious Diseases, Thammasat University Hospital, Khlong Nueng, Thailand.
Azlina Abbas3Orthopaedic Surgery, National Orthopaedic Centre of Excellence for Research and Learning (NOCERAL), Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpor, Malaysia.
Keita Morikane4Division of Clinical Laboratory and Infection Control Yamagata University Hospital, Yamagata, Japan.
Kil Yeon Lee5Surgery, Medical College, Kyung Hee University Center, Gangdong-gu, South Korea.
Anup Warrier6Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Aster Medcity, Kochi, India.
Koji YamadaOrthopaedic Surgery, Kanto Rosai Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Asia Pacific Society of Infection Control (APSIC) launched the APSIC Guidelines for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infections in 2018. This document describes the guidelines and recommendations for the setting prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs). It aims to highlight practical recommendations in a concise format designed to assist healthcare facilities at Asia Pacific region in achieving high standards in preoperative, perioperative and postoperative practices. Method: The guidelines were developed by an appointed workgroup comprising experts in the Asia Pacific region, following reviews of previously published guidelines and recommendations relevant to each section. Results: It recommends that healthcare facilities review specific risk factors and develop effective prevention strategies, which would be cost effective at local levels. Gaps identified are best closed using a quality improvement process. Surveillance of SSIs is recommended using accepted international methodology. The timely feedback of the data analysed would help in the monitoring of effective implementation of interventions. Conclusions: Healthcare facilities should aim for excellence in safe surgery practices. The implementation of evidence-based practices using a quality improvement process helps towards achieving effective and sustainable results.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAntibiotic ProphylaxisHealth Care SurveysHumansInfection ControlIntraoperative CarePreoperative CareSurgical Wound InfectionPreventionSafe surgerySSISurgical site infection

Identifiers

PMID31749962
PMCPMC6852795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.