Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31749899›Full record

ArticleCases in public health communication and marketing2015

Does your College Campus GYT? Evaluating the Effect of a Social Marketing Campaign Designed to Raise STI Awareness and Encourage Testing.

Melissa A Habel, Laura Haderxhanaj, Matthew Hogben, Heather Eastman-Mueller, Harrell Chesson, Craig M Roberts

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cases in public health communication and marketing, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Get Yourself Tested (GYT) Campaign: Investigating Campaign Awareness and Behaviors Among High School and College Students.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa A HabelCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Laura HaderxhanajCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Matthew HogbenCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Heather Eastman-MuellerUniversity of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Harrell ChessonCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Craig M RobertsUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USUniversity of Missouri · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSexually transmitted infections (STIs) impose a considerable health and economic burden among college-aged students. College students report engaging in a number of high-risk behaviors, including having multiple sex partners, unprotected sex, and using drugs and binge drinking during sex. This pilot evaluation investigated the associations between STI testing and the GYT:

methodsDuring April 2011, 12 geographically dispersed colleges implemented the GYT campaign. Each implemented a brief survey and recorded STI testing data. A total of 1,386 students were surveyed. We tested for associations with GYT campaign awareness and STI testing behaviors. Chi-square and binary regression analyses tested for associations with GYT campaign awareness, STI testing behaviors, and STI test results. Hierarchical linear models accounted for students nested within schools.

resultsStudents presenting for STI testing were more likely to have heard of GYT than students not doing so; campuses hosting promotional events had higher proportions of students aware of GYT. These colleges, however, did not have higher proportions of students getting tested. Chlamydia positivity averaged 3.1%, and an estimated $26,000 in direct medical costs and $24,000 in lost productivity costs were averted by STI testing and treatment.

conclusionsPre-packaged STI testing campaigns may serve as successful tools for colleges interested in promoting and increasing STI/HIV awareness, testing, and treatment. At the individual level, GYT awareness was related to testing, but the effects for school efforts need further exploration.

Indexed as

ChlamydiaGonorrheaHealth campaignsHIVSexually transmitted infectionsSocial marketingUniversity health services

Identifiers

PMID31749899
PMCPMC6866652
OpenAlexW2999198219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.