Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31749853›Full record

ArticleJournal of contemporary brachytherapy2019

Mould-based surface high-dose-rate brachytherapy for eyelid carcinoma.

Andrea Vavassori, Giulia Riva, Stefano Durante, Cristiana Fodor, Stefania Comi, Raffaella Cambria, Federica Cattani, Giuseppe Spadola, Roberto Orecchia, Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of contemporary brachytherapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Considerations on HDR brachytherapy for eyelid carcinoma.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. High-dose-rate plesiotherapy with customized molds in non-melanoma skin cancer: efficacy and safety at 10 years-single institution experience.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Innovations in brachytherapy.Taiwan journal of ophthalmology
    Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea VavassoriDepartment of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Giulia RivaDepartment of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Stefano DuranteDepartment of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Cristiana FodorDepartment of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Stefania ComiUnit of Medical Physics, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Raffaella CambriaUnit of Medical Physics, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Federica CattaniUnit of Medical Physics, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe SpadolaMelanoma, Sarcoma and Rare Tumors Surgery Department, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Roberto OrecchiaScientific Directorate, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Barbara Alicja Jereczek-FossaDepartment of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate toxicity and clinical outcomes in patients with eyelid tumour treated with contact high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT). MATERIAL AND

methodsBetween April 2010 and August 2017, 10 consecutive patients with tumour of the eyelid underwent contact HDR-BT and custom-made surface mould. Every applicator was manually built using conventional thermoplastic material and standard plastic catheters. The median dose prescribed was 42 Gy (range, 30-48) with a median dose per fraction of 3.5 Gy (range, 2-4.5). The dose was delivered in a median of 12 fractions (range, 10-17) over a median of 16 days. In all cases, an ocular shield was placed to reduce the dose to the eye. Acute and late toxicity was evaluated according to RTOG toxicity criteria.

resultsWe analyzed data of 9 of 10 patients (one patient was excluded because he did not give consent for investigation). The median age was 68 years (range, 31-88). According to the TNM-UICC staging system, 4, 1 and 4 patients were stage IA, IB and IC, respectively. Basal cell and sebaceous gland carcinomas were reported in 5 and 2 patients, respectively; other histological types were non-Hodgkin lymphoma and plasmacytoma. After a median follow-up of 51 months (range, 16-90), there was no evidence of local or distant recurrence. The treatment was very well tolerated. Most commonly acute reactions consisted of low grade (G1-G2) conjunctivitis and skin erythema. Only one patient required a temporary interruption of the treatment due to acute G2 conjunctivitis and G3 lid erythema. Only one G2 late toxicity was reported (corneal ulceration), without resulting in functional impairment or blindness.

conclusionsOur results suggest that contact HDR-BT with a customized applicator is safe, effective and offers very good local control and can be considered for the treatment of eyelid tumours.

Indexed as

brachytherapyeyelidHDRHDR-BT

Identifiers

PMID31749853
PMCPMC6854866
OpenAlexW2979524541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.