Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31749594›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2019

Bacterobilia in pancreatic surgery-conclusions for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis.

Colin Markus Krüger, Ulrich Adam, Thomas Adam, Axel Kramer, Claus D Heidecke, Frank Makowiec, Hartwig Riediger

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04555252 (Colonization of Bile Ducts and Post-operative Infectious Complications of Cephalic Duodenopancreatectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04555252 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Colonization of Bile Ducts and Post-operative Infectious Complications of Cephalic Duodenopancreatectomy : A Prospective Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorCentral Hospital, Nancy, FranceRan2020 to 2021Enrolled70ConditionsInfection, Bacterial
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Intraoperative Bile Culture in Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Teaching Old Dogma New Tricks.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Colin Markus KrügerDepartment of Surgery, Immanuel Hospital Rüdersdorf, Berlin 15562, Germany. cm.krueger@immanunel.de.
Ulrich AdamDepartment of General Surgery, Vivantes-Humboldt hospital, Berlin 13503, Germany.
Thomas AdamDepartment of Microbiology, Labor Berlin GmbH, Berlin 13353, Germany.
Axel KramerInstitute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald 17495, Mecklenburg Vorpommern, Germany.
Claus D HeideckeDepartment of Surgery, Clinic of General, Visceral, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald 17475, Mecklenburg Vorpommern, Germany.
Frank MakowiecSection of clinical risk assessment, University hospital of Freiburg, Freiburg 79106, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Hartwig RiedigerDepartment of General Surgery, Vivantes-Humboldt hospital, Berlin 13503, Germany.
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald · DEVivantes Klinikum · DEUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundJaundice or preoperative cholestasis (PC) are typical symptoms of pancreatic masses. Approximately 50% of patients undergo preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) placement. PBD is a common cause of bacterobilia (BB) and is a known surgical site infection risk factor. An adjustment of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) may be reasonable according to the profile of BB. For this, we examined the microbiological findings in routine series of patients.

aimTo investigate the incidence and profile of biliary bacterial colonization in patients undergoing pancreatic head resections.

methodsIn the period from January 2009 to December 2015, 285 consecutive pancreatic head resections were performed. Indications for surgery were malignancy (71%), chronic pancreatitis (18%), and others (11%). A PBD was in 51% and PC was in 42%. The standard PAP was ampicillin/sulbactam. Intraoperatively, a smear was taken from the hepatic duct. An analysis of the isolated species and resistograms was performed. Patients were categorized according to the presence or absence of PC (PC+/PC-) and PBD (PBD+/PBD-) into four groups. Antibiotic efficiency was analyzed for standard PAP and possible alternatives.

resultsBB was present in 150 patients (53%). BB was significantly more frequent in PBD+ (

conclusionPBD-/PC- and PBD-/PC+ were associated with a low rate of BB, while PBD+ was always associated with a high rate of BB. In PBD+ patients, BB was polymicrobial and more often associated with Enterococcus. In PBD+, the spectrum of potential bacteria may not be covered by standard PAP. A more potent alternative for prophylactic application, however, was not found.

Indexed as

Antibiotic ProphylaxisAnti-Bacterial AgentsBileBile DuctsCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeCholestasisCommon Bile Duct NeoplasmsDrainageHumansJaundice, ObstructiveMultivariate AnalysisPancreatectomyPancreaticoduodenectomyPancreatitisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic prophylaxisBacteriobiliaCholangiopancreatographyCholestasisEndoscopic retrogradePancreatic surgery

Identifiers

PMID31749594
PMCPMC6848011
OpenAlexW2985339836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.