ArticleJournal of food science and technology2019
Comparison of the antimicrobial activity of propolis extracts obtained by means of various extraction methods.
Article in Journal of food science and technology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed.
- LC-QTOF-MS Chemical Characterization, Cytotoxicity, and Antimicrobial Activity of Blue Geopropolis: An Emerging Type of Brazilian Propolis.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Antibacterial, Phytochemical, and Antioxidant Properties of Propolis Extracts Obtained Using Different Solvents Against Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Antibiofilm and Immunomodulatory Effects of Cinnamaldehyde in Corneal Epithelial Infection Models: Ocular Treatments Approach.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Recent developments and innovative application of propolis in the food industry: a natural preservative from honeybee waste.Food science and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Efficacy Study of Propolis Eutectic Extract in Gel Formulations for the Treatment of Bacterial Skin Diseases in Dogs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- An Innovative Method of Obtaining Herbal Propolis Extracts and Application of its Spray-Dried Form as Natural Food Preservatives.International journal of food science · 2025Article
- Virtual Screening and Meta-Analysis Approach Identifies Factors for Inversion Stimulation (Fis) and Other Genes Responsible for Biofilm Production inCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2024Article
- The Comparative Study of the Antioxidant and Antibacterial Effects of Propolis Extracts in Veterinary Medicine.Veterinary sciences · 2024Article
- Effects of short- and long-term use of propolis extracts on liver and kidney in rats.Food science & nutrition · 2024Article
- Physicochemical Properties, Antioxidant Activity, and High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography Profiling of Propolis Samples from Western Australia.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Therapeutic potential activity of quercetin complexes against Streptococcus pneumoniae.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Anti-Heliyon · 2024Article
- Potential Antidiabetic Activity ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Examination of Raw Samples and Ethanol Extracts of Gerês Propolis Collected in Different Years.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Exploring the Functional Properties of Propolis, Geopropolis, and Cerumen, with a Special Emphasis on Their Antimicrobial Effects.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Effects of Propolis Impregnation on Polylactic Acid (PLA) Scaffolds Loaded with Wollastonite Particles againstPolymers · 2023Article
- Antimicrobial Activity of Spanish Propolis againstMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Do ultrasonic field effects upon the polyphenolics profile of propolis extracts improve their antioxidant and antimicrobial activity?Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of the study was to compare the antimicrobial activities of ethanolic propolis extracts obtained using different extraction methods. Extraction of propolis was carried out using 70% ethanol, propolis to ethanol ratios of 1:10 and 1:5, extraction times of 1 or 7 days, and shaking extraction (SE), ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), and ultrasound-assisted shaking extraction (SUAE) methods. A total of 12 propolis extract lyophilizates were obtained. Samples were tested for extraction yield and for total phenol content by the Folin-Ciocalteau colourimetric method, and total flavonoid content using a spectrophotometric method. GLC/MS was used for the identification of chemical compounds in selected extract lyophilizates. Antimicrobial activity against selected bacterial and fungal species was assessed using the disk diffusion method. Propolis extracts obtained as the result of 1-day and 7-day shaking extraction followed by 20 min of ultrasound-assisted extraction (SUAE) had better antimicrobial properties as compared to those obtained by SE or UAE alone. SE and UAE gave lower extraction yields as well as lower phenol and flavonoid contents compared to SUAE. No differences were observed with regard to the qualitative composition of extracts obtained by any of the methods. It is best to obtain the extract using the combined method of 1-day extraction and 20-min sonication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.