ArticleJournal of food science and technology2019
Article in Journal of food science and technology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Foodborne Pathogen Prevalence and Biomarker Identification for Microbial Contamination in Mutton Meat.Biology · 2024Article
- Antimicrobial Resistance and Genomic Characterization ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Genetic Relationship betweenAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- In-House Validation of Multiplex PCR for Simultaneous Detection of Shiga Toxin-ProducingFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Occurrence and distribution ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Occurrence ofMicroorganisms · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prevalence of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.