ArticleActa stomatologica Croatica2019
Long-term Effectiveness of Occlusal Splint Therapy Compared to Placebo in Patients with Chronic Temporomandibular Disorders.
Article in Acta stomatologica Croatica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04694274 (Genetic Polymorphisms and Their Association With Temporomandibular Disorders), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Genetic Polymorphisms and Their Association With Temporomandibular Disorders
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Occlusal interventions for managing temporomandibular disorders.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Effectiveness of a Novel Mono-Block Splint Versus a Twin-Block Splint for Anterior Disc Displacement With Reduction: A Randomised Controlled Trial.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2026Trial
- The Effectiveness of Multimodality Treatment Including Stabilization Splint and Low-Level Laser Therapies on Managing Temporomandibular Disorders: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2025Trial
- Comparative evaluation of occlusal splint therapy and muscle energy technique in the management of temporomandibular disorders: A randomized controlled clinical trial.Journal of Indian Prosthodontic SocietyTrial
- A machine learning approach to predict treatment response in myofascial pain patients receiving masseter trigger point injections.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Accuracy and empathy of AI-based conversational chatbots in response to temporomandibular dysfunction related queries.PEC innovation · 2026Article
- Subchondral bone alterations in temporomandibulat joint arthralgia negatively affect the functional results of stabilization appliance therapy. A retrospective exploratory cohort study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparative effectiveness of traditional East Asian medicine treatments for temporomandibular joint disorders: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Integrative medicine research · 2025Review
- Stabilization Splint Therapy for Patients with Temporomandibular Disorders Improves Opening Movements and Jaw Limitation and Attenuates Pain by Influencing the Levels of IL-7, IL-8, and IL-13 in the Gingival Crevicular Fluid.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Finite element analysis of stabilization splint pressure distribution in a patient with disc displacement without reduction: A preliminary study.Imaging science in dentistry · 2024Article
- Genetic Influences of Proinflammatory Cytokines on Pain Severity in Patients with Temporomandibular Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the efficacy and quality of life in patients with temporomandibular joint disorders treated with Kovacs digital occlusal splint: a pilot study.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Effects of storage and toothbrush simulation on Martens hardness of CAD/CAM, hand-cast, thermoforming, and 3D-printed splint materials.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Article
- Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Temporomandibular Joint and Occlusion from 2000 to 2022.Journal of pain research · 2023Article
- Oral splints in the management of nociceptive pain and migraines: A scoping review.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2023Article
- Effects of storage and toothbrush simulation on color, gloss, and roughness of CAD/CAM, hand-cast, thermoforming, and 3D-printed splint materials.Clinical oral investigations · 2022Article
- Oxygen-Ozone Therapy for Reducing Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines Serum Levels in Musculoskeletal and Temporomandibular Disorders: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- The Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Stress Levels and Occurrence of Stomatoghnatic System Disorders (SSDs) among Physiotherapy Students in Poland.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Profiling of Patients with Temporomandibular Disorders: Experience of One Tertiary Care Center.Acta stomatologica Croatica · 2021Article
- Prevalence of TMD among Children Provided with Fixed Orthodontic Treatment.Acta stomatologica Croatica · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to compare long-term effectiveness of stabilization splint (SS) with that of placebo splint (PS) in chronic TMD patients and to investigate differences in treatment outcomes based on diagnostic subgroups [disc displacement (DD)/myofascial pain (MP)]. MATERIALS AND
methodsThirty-four female participants, diagnosed with chronic TMD, were classified in groups: one provided with SS and other with PS and were followed for six months. Treatment outcomes included spontaneous pain [visual analogue scale (VAS)], self-perceived quality of life (OHIP-14), pain-free maximal mouth opening (MCO), maximal mouth opening (MMO), level of perceived stress (PSS), characteristic pain intensity [graded chronic pain scale (GCPS)], and functional jaw limitation [jaw functional limitation scale (JFLS)].
resultsBaseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups (p>0.05). After six months of treatment the changes in spontaneous pain and OHIP-14 scores differed significantly between treatment groups (p=0.004, p=0.02 respectively), with greater reduction in SS compared to the PS group. Pain-free maximal mouth opening did not change significantly over time, however MCO values differed significantly between the two treatment groups, with greater overall values in the SS compared to the PS group (p= 0.046), as well as between TMD subgroups, with greater overall values in MP compared to DD patients (p= 0.03). In the SS group, significant difference in JFLS categories was found between baseline and after 6 months of treatment in all except emotional and verbal expression (mastication p=0.00015; vertical jaw mobility p=0.00018). No such changes in JFLS categories were observed in the PS group.
conclusionsDuring 6-month period, SS was more effective than PS in reducing spontaneous pain and improving self-perceived quality of life and functional limitations of the lower jaw. Moreover, significantely higher values of pain-free mouth opening were observed in patients treated with stabilization splint. While placebo might be partly responsible for improving the symptoms of TMD, it seems that itcannot maintain a continual long-term positive therapeutic effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.