Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31749409›Full record

SynthesisEmerging microbes & infections2019

Are adenoviruses zoonotic? A systematic review of the evidence.

Laura K Borkenhagen, Jane K Fieldhouse, Donald Seto, Gregory C Gray

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Emerging microbes & infections, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Metagenomic analysis of viral diversity in Portuguese bats.Veterinary research communications · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Mysteries of adenovirus packaging.Journal of virology · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The adenovirus DNA-binding protein DBP.Journal of virology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Laura K BorkenhagenDivision of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine and Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5619-2609
Jane K FieldhouseDivision of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine and Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5450-0970
Donald SetoBioinformatics and Computational Biology Program, School of Systems Biology, George Mason University, Manassas, VA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0379-0330
Gregory C GrayDivision of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine and Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4628-5908
Duke University · USGeorge Mason University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adenoviruses (AdVs) are major contributors to clinical illnesses. Novel human and animal AdVs continue to be identified and characterized. Comparative analyses using bioinformatic methods and Omics-based technologies allow insights into how these human pathogens have emerged and their potential for host cross-species transmission. Systematic review of literature published across ProQuest, Pubmed, and Web of Science databases for evidence of adenoviral zoonotic potential identified 589 citations. After removing duplicates, 327 citations were screened for relevance; of which, 74 articles received full-text reviews. Among these, 24 were included here, of which 16 demonstrated evidence of zoonotic transmission of AdVs. These documented instances of AdV crossing host species barriers between humans and non-human primate, bat, feline, swine, canine, ovine, and caprine. Eight studies sought to but did not find evidence of zoonosis. The findings demonstrate substantial evidence suggesting AdVs have previously and will continue crossing host species barriers. These have human health consequences both in terms of novel pathogen emergence and epidemic outbreaks, and of appropriate and safe use of non-human adenoviruses for therapeutics. As routine human clinical diagnostics may miss a novel cross-species adenovirus infection in humans, next generation sequencing or panspecies molecular diagnostics may be necessary to detect such incursions.

Indexed as

AdenoviridaeAdenoviridae InfectionsAnimalsCatsDogsGoatsHost SpecificityHumansPhylogenySheepSwineZoonosesAdenovirusanthropozoonosiscross-specieszooanthroponosiszoonotic

Identifiers

PMID31749409
PMCPMC6882429
OpenAlexW2990203560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.