Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31749329›Full record

ArticlePM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation2020

A Pilot Study Testing a Novel 3D Printed Amphibious Lower Limb Prosthesis in a Recreational Pool Setting.

Todd Goldstein, Anthony Oreste, Glenn Hutnick, Ashley Chory, Veronica Chehata, Joseph Seldin, Michael D Gallo, Ona Bloom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. 3D printing and prostheses: The current state-of-the-art and future directions.Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Todd GoldsteinThe Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY.
Anthony OresteDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra Northwell, Manhasset, NY.
Glenn HutnickEschen Prosthetics and Orthotics, Bohemia, NY.
Ashley ChoryThe Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY.
Veronica ChehataDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra Northwell, Manhasset, NY.
Joseph SeldinDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra Northwell, Manhasset, NY.
Michael D GalloThe Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY.
Ona BloomThe Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-8340-2392

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdults with limb amputation and other physical disabilities are less likely to participate in physical activity than adults in the general population and have elevated risk of heart disease and stroke. Swimming is a physical activity often recommended for persons with limb amputation. However, a standard economical swim prosthesis that facilitates easy transition from land to water does not exist.

objectiveThe objectives were (1) to measure ease of first-time use and likability of a novel U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared 510(k) three-dimensional (3D) printed device, the "FIN," in a recreational pool; and (2) to determine differences in time to complete basic swim tasks using the novel 3D printed amphibious lower limb prosthesis or a standard Swim Ankle prosthesis. Our hypotheses were the following: (1) that the novel 3D printed amphibious lower limb prosthesis would be easy and likeable upon first use; and (2) that basic swim tasks would take comparable time to complete with either device.

settingAcademic medical center and community pool in New York.

participantsParticipants were (N = 10) English-speaking adults with a transtibial amputation who self-identified to swim comfortably in a recreational setting.

interventionsParticipants completed tasks typical of recreational swimming while wearing the novel 3D printed amphibious lower limb prosthesis or a Swim Ankle. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Participants performed a series of recreational swim tasks at self-selected speeds: entering/exiting pool, walking, swimming, and treading water, and completed a survey to assess the primary outcomes: likability, ease of use, and adverse events (feasibility).

resultsParticipants found the novel 3D printed amphibious lower limb prosthesis more likable compared to the Swim Ankle and easy to use. Time to exit the pool was significantly reduced with the novel 3D printed amphibious lower limb prosthesis, while time to complete a 25-m lap was comparable. Participants did not show significant changes in vital signs when using either prosthesis.

conclusionsThe novel 3D printed amphibious lower limb prosthesis was likable and easy to use upon first use. This study supports conducting a larger clinical trial to determine if the data are broadly reproducible.

Indexed as

Artificial LimbsPrinting, Three-DimensionalSwimmingAdultAmputation, SurgicalHumansPilot ProjectsSwimming Pools

Identifiers

PMID31749329
PMCPMC7496828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.