ArticleStatistics in medicine2020
Integrating approximate single factor graphical models.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A penalized integrative deep neural network for variable selection among multiple omics datasets.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2024Article
- Vertical integration methods for gene expression data analysis.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Review
- High-dimensional integrative copula discriminant analysis for multiomics data.Statistics in medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the analysis of complex and high-dimensional data, graphical models have been commonly adopted to describe associations among variables. When common factors exist which make the associations dense, the single factor graphical model has been proposed, which first extracts the common factor and then conducts graphical modeling. Under other simpler contexts, it has been recognized that results generated from analyzing a single dataset are often unsatisfactory, and integrating multiple datasets can effectively improve variable selection and estimation. In graphical modeling, the increased number of parameters makes the "lack of information" problem more severe. In this article, we integrate multiple datasets and conduct the approximate single factor graphical model analysis. A novel penalization approach is developed for the identification and estimation of important loadings and edges. An effective computational algorithm is developed. A wide spectrum of simulations and the analysis of breast cancer gene expression datasets demonstrate the competitive performance of the proposed approach. Overall, this study provides an effective new venue for taking advantage of multiple datasets and improving graphical model analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.