SynthesisEcology2020
Soil chemistry turned upside down: a meta-analysis of invasive earthworm effects on soil chemical properties.
Synthesis in Ecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving carbon modeling in aspen-dominated forests: Lessons from CBM-CFS3 evaluation against long-term field data.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026Article
- Temperate Forest Floors: Ecosystem Hubs in Transition?Global change biology · 2026Review
- Rice-eel system combined with exogenous organic waste improves soil quality under nitrogen deficiency by regulating soil microbial community.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Global changes and their environmental stressors have a significant impact on soil biodiversity-A meta-analysis.iScience · 2024Article
- Invasive earthworms can change understory plant community traits and reduce plant functional diversity.iScience · 2024Article
- Capacity and establishment rules govern the number of nonnative species in communities of ground-dwelling invertebrates.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Invasive earthworms shift soil microbial community structure in northern North American forest ecosystems.iScience · 2024Article
- The responses of COPeerJ · 2024Article
- Unlocking complex soil systems as carbon sinks: multi-pool management as the key.Nature communications · 2023Review
- Earthworms as catalysts in the formation and stabilization of soil microbial necromass.Global change biology · 2022Article
- The long-term effects of invasive earthworms on plant community composition and diversity in a hardwood forest in northern Minnesota.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Aboveground impacts of a belowground invader: how invasive earthworms alter aboveground arthropod communities in a northern North American forest.Biology letters · 2022Article
- Article
- Effects of straw returning combined with earthworm addition on nitrification and ammonia oxidizers in paddy soil.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Invasive earthworms reduce chemical defense and increase herbivory and pathogen infection in native trees.The Journal of ecology · 2021Article
- Do Invasive Earthworms Affect the Functional Traits of Native Plants?Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Terrestrial Isopods Porcellio scaber and Oniscus asellus (Crustacea: Isopoda) Increase Bacterial Abundance and Modify Microbial Community Structure in Leaf Litter Microcosms: a Short-Term Decomposition Study.Microbial ecology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent studies have shown that invasive earthworms can dramatically reduce native biodiversity, both above and below the ground. However, we still lack a synthetic understanding of the underlying mechanisms behind these changes, such as whether earthworm effects on soil chemical properties drive such relationships. Here, we investigated the effects of invasive earthworms on soil chemical properties (pH, water content, and the stocks and fluxes of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus) by conducting a meta-analysis. Invasive earthworms generally increased soil pH, indicating that the removal of organic layers and the upward transport of more base-rich mineral soil caused a shift in soil pH. Moreover, earthworms significantly decreased soil water content, suggesting that the burrowing activities of earthworms may have increased water infiltration of and/or increased evapotranspiration from soil. Notably, invasive earthworms had opposing effects on organic and mineral soil for carbon and nitrogen stocks, with decreases in organic, and increases in mineral soil. Nitrogen fluxes were higher in mineral soil, whereas fluxes in organic soil were not significantly affected by the presence of invasive earthworms, indicating that earthworms mobilize and redistribute nutrients among soil layers and increase overall nitrogen loss from the soil. Invasive earthworm effects on element stocks increased with ecological group richness only in organic soil. Earthworms further decreased ammonium stocks with negligible effects on nitrate stocks in organic soil, whereas they increased nitrate stocks but not ammonium stocks in mineral soil. Notably, all of these results were consistent across forest and grassland ecosystems underlining the generality of our findings. However, we found some significant differences between studies that were conducted in the field (observational and experimental settings) and in the lab, such as that the effects on soil pH decreased from field to lab settings, calling for a careful interpretation of lab findings. Our meta-analysis provides strong empirical evidence that earthworm invasion may lead to substantial changes in soil chemical properties and element cycling in soil. Furthermore, our results can help explain the dramatic effects of invasive earthworms on native biodiversity, for example, shifts towards the dominance of grass species over herbaceous ones, as shown by recent meta-analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.