Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31749129›Full record

ArticleMonash bioethics review2019

Ethical issues associated with solid organ transplantation and substance use: a scoping review.

Lauren Notini, Denitsa Vasileva, Ani Orchanian-Cheff, Daniel Z Buchman

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Monash bioethics review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. When demand exceeds supply: Liver transplantation due to alcohol use disorder in Austria.Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lauren NotiniJoint Centre for Bioethics, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Suite 754, Toronto, ON, M5T 1P8, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5055-9505
Denitsa VasilevaUniversity Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8778-6442
Ani Orchanian-CheffLibrary and Information Services, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9943-2692
Daniel Z BuchmanJoint Centre for Bioethics, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Suite 754, Toronto, ON, M5T 1P8, Canada. daniel.buchman@utoronto.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8944-6647

Funding

State Government of Victoria Operational Infrastructure ProgramUniversity Health Network Salary SupportUniversity of Toronto Fellowship in ClinicalUniversity of Toronto Organizational Bioethics
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While solid organ transplantation for patients with substance use issues has attracted ethical discussion, a typology of the ethics themes has not been articulated in the literature. We conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed literature on solid organ transplantation and substance use published between January 1997 and April 2016. We aimed to identify and develop a typology of the main ethical themes discussed in this literature and to identify gaps worthy of future research. Seventy articles met inclusion criteria and underwent inductive content analysis. Four main ethical themes were identified: (1) personal responsibility; (2) utility; (3) moral character; and (4) fairness. Each theme had multiple sub-themes and there was substantial overlap between themes. This scoping review identified a disproportionate emphasis in the literature regarding personal responsibility, which was referenced by each of the other themes, and a narrow focus on alcohol and liver. We recommend future research further investigate these connections between ethical themes and focus on ethical issues associated with transplants from organ groups other than liver for patients who use substances other than alcohol.

Indexed as

EthicsTransplant RecipientsBeneficenceHumansMoral StatusOrgan TransplantationPersonal AutonomyRoleSocial JusticeSubstance-Related DisordersBioethicsOrgan transplantationPersonal responsibilityScoping reviewSubstance use

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.