ArticleDrug safety2020
Fatal Toxicity Indices for Medicine-Related Deaths in New Zealand, 2008-2013.
Article in Drug safety, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Suicide adverse events associated with zopiclone and eszopiclone: A pharmacovigilance analysis based on FAERS, JADER and CVARD.PloS one · 2026Article
- The relative toxicity of medicines detected after poisoning suicide deaths in Australia, 2013-19: a data linkage case series study.The Medical journal of Australia · 2025Article
- Fatal Intoxications with Zopiclone-A Cause for Concern?Drug safety · 2024Article
- The cardiovascular safety of tricyclic antidepressants in overdose and in clinical use.Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2024Review
- Closing the Gap for Children with OCD: A Staged-Care Model of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy with Exposure and Response Prevention.Clinical child and family psychology review · 2023Review
- Fatal Events Associated with Adverse Drug Reactions in the Korean National Pharmacovigilance Database.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe fatal toxicity index (FTI) is a measure for assessing the relative risks of death due to the medicines prescribed in a population. This knowledge is useful for prescribers and informs medicine safety initiatives. This study aimed to calculate FTIs for the New Zealand population using three methodologies.
methodsNew Zealand coronial data describing medicine-related deaths from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2013 were retrospectively extracted from the National Coronial Information System. Three fatal toxicity indices were derived using the number of deaths attributed to each pharmaceutical as the numerator and the total defined daily doses, number of patients and number of prescriptions as denominators.
resultsThere were 703 medicine-related deaths, of which 627 were assessed as due to one primary contributor. Median decedent age was 48 years (interquartile range 37-58), and 319 (51%) were male. Deaths were intentional in 252 cases (40%), unintentional in 284 (45%) and unknown in 91 (15%). The majority of deaths (n = 486, 78%) occurred in the community. Opioids, antidepressants, antipsychotics and hypnotic-anxiolytics caused most fatalities. While the FTIs for individual medicines varied by denominator applied, methadone and clozapine fatalities were prominent in all three indices. The antidepressants clomipramine, dosulepin and doxepin consistently returned the highest FTIs in their group.
conclusionNew Zealand prescribers should be aware of the high relative risk of death associated with methadone and clozapine; that clomipramine, dosulepin and doxepin were identified as the most dangerous antidepressants; and that zopiclone carries a similar fatal risk to benzodiazepines. Varying results were found between the FTIs calculated, making comparisons, particularly between populations, difficult.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.