ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2020
Clinical Significance of Tumor Deposits in Gastric Cancer: a Retrospective and Propensity Score-Matched Study at Two Institutions.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Residual tumor deposits after neoadjuvant therapy and 3-year survival outcomes in gastric cancer: a single-center retrospective cohort study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Incorporating tumor deposits into the TNM staging of gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study for prognostic validation and staging optimization.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- ASSOCIATION OF TUMOR DEPOSITS WITH TUMOR PATHOLOGY AND SURVIVAL IN GASTRIC CANCER: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY.Arquivos de gastroenterologia · 2026Article
- Prognostic impact and clinical staging adjustment of tumor deposits in postoperative radioiodine therapy for differentiated thyroid cancer.Endocrine · 2025Article
- Evaluating the prognostic significance of tumor deposits in gastric cancer and strategies for their integration into the TNM staging system: a single-center retrospective study.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- The value analysis of tumor deposit in the comprehensive evaluation before differentiated thyroid cancer RAI therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Prediction of tumor deposits in stage I-III gastric cancer: a clinically applicable nomogram integrating clinicopathology outcomes.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Construction and validation of a prognostic model for gastric cancer patients with tumor deposits.PeerJ · 2024Article
- Clinical significance of tumor deposits in gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy: a propensity score matching study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Presence of tumor deposits is an indicator of poor prognosis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.American journal of cancer research · 2023Article
- Prognostic significance of tumor deposits in radically resected gastric cancer: a retrospective study of a cohort of 1915 Chinese individuals.World journal of surgical oncology · 2022Article
- Tumor Characteristics Associated with Lymph Node Metastasis and Prognosis in Patients with ERBB2-Positive Gastric Cancer.Journal of oncology · 2022Article
- Observational
- Clinicopathological factors associated with the presence of tumor deposits in resected gastric cancer patients.Heliyon · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastric cancer (GC) treatment is largely determined by tumor stage. Despite improvements in the mode of treatment of various types of advanced disease, staging is still evolving. The role of tumor deposits (TDs) in staging remains debated. The purpose of this research is to investigate the relationship between TDs and prognosis in GC.
methodsA total of 3098 patients were considered eligible for prognostic analysis (2706 patients in the TDs-negative group and 392 patients in the TDs-positive group). A one-to-one propensity score-matching analysis was performed using a logistic regression mode and the following covariates: age, gender, tumor location, size, differentiation, perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, pTNM stage, type of gastrectomy, and the number of lymph nodes retrieved between TDs-negative and TDs-positive group, then 323 patients in each group were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors were conducted accordingly. The predictive ability of different staging system incorporating TDs was evaluated.
resultsTDs were present in 14.5% cases and almost all of the patients (99%) suffered from advanced GC. Multivariate analysis showed that pN stage, chemotherapy, and TDs were the independent prognostic factors. The TDs-positive group showed a lower rate of 5-year disease-free survival compared with the TDs-negative group in all patients, stage II, and stage III patients (p = 0.001, 0.029, and 0.003, respectively). The 5-year disease-free survival for patients with TDs and without TDs was 27.6% and 34.4%, respectively.
conclusionsOur research shows that TDs are closely associated with prognosis in GC. TDs should be incorporated into the TNM staging system, which could then accurately improve the staging reliability and prognostic assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31749098What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.