Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31749071›Full record

ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2020

A quantitative high-resolution computational mechanics cell model for growing and regenerating tissues.

Paul Van Liedekerke, Johannes Neitsch, Tim Johann, Enrico Warmt, Ismael Gonzàlez-Valverde, Stefan Hoehme, Steffen Grosser, Josef Kaes, Dirk Drasdo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Paul Van LiedekerkeInria Paris & Sorbonne Université LJLL, 2 Rue Simone IFF, 75012, Paris, France. paul.van_liedekerke@inria.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9314-6281
Johannes NeitschInterdisciplinary Centre for Bioinformatics, Leipzig University, Härtelstr. 16-18, 04107, Leipzig, Germany.
Tim JohannIfADo - Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Ardeystrasse 67, Dortmund, Germany.
Enrico WarmtFaculty of Physics and Earth Science, Peter Debye Institute for Soft Matter Physics, Leipzig University, Linnéstraße 5, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Ismael Gonzàlez-ValverdeM2be, University of Zaragoza, C/ Maria de Luna s/n, 50018, Zaragoza, Spain.
Stefan HoehmeInterdisciplinary Centre for Bioinformatics, Leipzig University, Härtelstr. 16-18, 04107, Leipzig, Germany.
Steffen GrosserFaculty of Physics and Earth Science, Peter Debye Institute for Soft Matter Physics, Leipzig University, Linnéstraße 5, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Josef KaesFaculty of Physics and Earth Science, Peter Debye Institute for Soft Matter Physics, Leipzig University, Linnéstraße 5, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Dirk DrasdoInria Paris & Sorbonne Université LJLL, 2 Rue Simone IFF, 75012, Paris, France. dirk.drasdo@inria.fr.
Leipzig University · DEInstitut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique · FRTelstra (Australia) · AUTU Dortmund University · DEUniversidad de Zaragoza · ES

Funding

European Research Council 741350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mathematical models are increasingly designed to guide experiments in biology, biotechnology, as well as to assist in medical decision making. They are in particular important to understand emergent collective cell behavior. For this purpose, the models, despite still abstractions of reality, need to be quantitative in all aspects relevant for the question of interest. This paper considers as showcase example the regeneration of liver after drug-induced depletion of hepatocytes, in which the surviving and dividing hepatocytes must squeeze in between the blood vessels of a network to refill the emerged lesions. Here, the cells' response to mechanical stress might significantly impact the regeneration process. We present a 3D high-resolution cell-based model integrating information from measurements in order to obtain a refined and quantitative understanding of the impact of cell-biomechanical effects on the closure of drug-induced lesions in liver. Our model represents each cell individually and is constructed by a discrete, physically scalable network of viscoelastic elements, capable of mimicking realistic cell deformation and supplying information at subcellular scales. The cells have the capability to migrate, grow, and divide, and the nature and parameters of their mechanical elements can be inferred from comparisons with optical stretcher experiments. Due to triangulation of the cell surface, interactions of cells with arbitrarily shaped (triangulated) structures such as blood vessels can be captured naturally. Comparing our simulations with those of so-called center-based models, in which cells have a largely rigid shape and forces are exerted between cell centers, we find that the migration forces a cell needs to exert on its environment to close a tissue lesion, is much smaller than predicted by center-based models. To stress generality of the approach, the liver simulations were complemented by monolayer and multicellular spheroid growth simulations. In summary, our model can give quantitative insight in many tissue organization processes, permits hypothesis testing in silico, and guide experiments in situations in which cell mechanics is considered important.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, BiologicalAlgorithmsBiomechanical PhenomenaCalibrationCell AdhesionCell Line, TumorCell MovementCell ProliferationCytoskeletonHepatocytesHumansLiverNeoplasmsRegenerationCell-based modelCell mechanicsHigh resolution cell modelLiver regenerationOptical stretcher

Identifiers

PMID31749071
PMCPMC7005086
OpenAlexW2936719190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.