Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31749019›Full record

ReviewThe ultrasound journal2019

Point-of-care ultrasound in primary care: a systematic review of generalist performed point-of-care ultrasound in unselected populations.

Bjarte Sorensen, Steinar Hunskaar

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The ultrasound journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 85 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04583670 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

How Point-of-care Ultrasound Affects the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Process in General Practice. A Prospective Follow-up Study in France

TypeobservationalSponsorSorbonne UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled655ConditionsPoint of Care Ultrasound
NCT06068595 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Contribution of Targeted Musculoskeletal Ultrasound to the General Practitioner's Overall Decision-making Strategy for Patients With Suspected Musculoskeletal Pathology: a Before/After Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentral Hospital, Nancy, FranceRan2024 to 2027Enrolled300ConditionsMusculoskeletal, AnomalyArmsmusculoskeletal ultrasound
NCT07339007 enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Observational Study to Validate a Family Physician Echocardiography Training Programme

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorSocietat Catalana de Medicina Familiar i Comunitària, Assoc. (CAMFiC)Ran2023 to 2027Enrolled500ConditionsHeart Failure, Valvular Heart Diseases, Atrial Fibrillation (AF), Arterial HypertensionArmsCohort of GPs: Training program, Cohort of patients
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Assessing left ventricular systolic function by emergency physician using point of care echocardiography compared to expert: systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Implementing point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) in UK primary care: current and future perspectives.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bjarte SorensenHjelmeland General Practice Surgery, Prestagarden 13, 4130, Hjelmeland, Norway. bjarte.sorensen@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6328-0869
Steinar HunskaarDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBoth the interest and actual extent of use of point-of-care ultrasound, PoCUS, among general practitioners or family physicians are increasing and training is also increasingly implemented in residency programs. However, the amount of research within the field is still rather limited compared to what is seen within other specialties in which it has become more established, such as in the specialty of emergency medicine. An assumption is made that what is relevant for emergency medicine physicians and their populations is also relevant to the general practitioner, as both groups are generalists working in unselected populations. This systematic review aims to examine the extent of use and to identify clinical studies on the use of PoCUS by either general practitioners or emergency physicians on indications that are relevant for the former, both in their daily practice and in out-of-hours services.

methodsSystematic searches were done in PubMed/MEDLINE using terms related to general practice, emergency medicine, and ultrasound.

resultsOn the extent of use, we identified 19 articles, as well as 26 meta-analyses and 168 primary studies on the clinical use of PoCUS. We found variable, but generally low, use among general practitioners, while it seems to be thoroughly established in emergency medicine in North America, and increasingly also in the rest of the world. In terms of clinical studies, most were on diagnostic accuracy, and most organ systems were studied; the heart, lungs/thorax, vessels, abdominal and pelvic organs, obstetric ultrasound, the eye, soft tissue, and the musculoskeletal system. The studies found in general either high sensitivity or high specificity for the particular test studied, and in some cases high total accuracy and superiority to other established diagnostic imaging modalities. PoCUS also showed faster time to diagnosis and change in management in some studies.

conclusionOur review shows that generalists can, given a certain level of pre-test probability, safely use PoCUS in a wide range of clinical settings to aid diagnosis and better the care of their patients.

Indexed as

Emergency medicineFamily medicineGeneral practicePoint-of-care ultrasoundUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID31749019
PMCPMC6868077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.