ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020
Differences in root surface adsorption, root uptake, subcellular distribution, and chemical forms of Cd between low- and high-Cd-accumulating wheat cultivars.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent advances in understanding the mechanisms of plant cadmium accumulation as affected by grafting in vegetable production.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Exogenous Glutathione Alleviation of Cd Toxicity in Italian Ryegrass (International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Selenite Uptake and Transformation in Rice Seedlings (Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The differences in the mechanism of cadmium (Cd) accumulation in the grains of different wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars remain unclear. Thus, we conducted a hydroponic experiment in a greenhouse to compare root surface adsorption, root uptake, subcellular distribution, and chemical forms of Cd between low- and high-Cd-accumulating wheat cultivars at seedling stage, to improve our understanding of the differences between cultivars. The results showed that Cd adsorbed on the root surface was mainly in a complexed form, and the total amount of Cd on the Yaomai16 (YM, high-Cd-accumulating genotypes) root surface was higher (p < 0.05) than that on Xinmai9817 (XM, low-Cd-accumulating genotypes). A large amount of Cd ions adsorbed on root surface would cause plant damage and inhibit growth. Comparing the root-to-shoot translocation factors of Cd, the transfer coefficients of YM were 1.017, 1.446, 1.464, and 1.030 times higher than those of XM under 5, 10, 50, and 100 μmol L
Indexed as
Identifiers
31749002What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.