Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31748957›Full record

ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2019

Anatomical References to Evaluate Thoracic Aorta Calcium by Computed Tomography.

Jesiana Ferreira Pedrosa, Sandhi Maria Barreto, Márcio Sommer Bittencourt, Antonio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Gut microbes
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jesiana Ferreira PedrosaFaculdade de Medicina e Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Avenida Alfredo Balena 190, Bairro Santa Efigênia, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30130-100, Brazil. jesianafp@gmail.com.
Sandhi Maria BarretoFaculdade de Medicina e Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Avenida Alfredo Balena 190, Bairro Santa Efigênia, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30130-100, Brazil.
Márcio Sommer BittencourtFaculdade de Medicina e Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Antonio Luiz Pinho RibeiroFaculdade de Medicina e Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Avenida Alfredo Balena 190, Bairro Santa Efigênia, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30130-100, Brazil.
Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThoracic aortic calcium (TAC) has received some interest in recent studies as an important subclinical marker of atherosclerosis. Besides that, using computed tomography (CT) scans performed with cardiac or chest protocols, ECG-gated, or non-gated, TAC can be easily evaluated with no addition in radiation dose. This review discusses the particularities of the aortic wall calcium formation, as well as the differences between the aortic segments and summarizes the current status of TAC evaluation, mainly concerning the anatomical references used in the studies. RECENT

findingsThe studies have evaluated TAC considering different anatomical references. It was identified two different study groups. In the first one, researchers have analyzed the aorta as the sum of calcium in the ascending aorta (ATAC), aortic arch (AAC), and descending thoracic aorta (DTAC). The second group has used cardiac CT scans to assess TAC; therefore, they did not include AAC; however, the aortic root calcium (ARC) was added in the analysis. So, caution is advisable when interpreting and comparing studies that used different TAC anatomical references. The broad methodological variability, in addition to the variations in the population characteristics of the studies on TAC, may be in part contributing to the differences between results of different studies. Currently TAC does not have a role in clinical decisions, so it is necessary to create a standard protocol for the aortic calcium research as well as exists for the coronary artery calcium evaluation.

Indexed as

Aorta, ThoracicAortic DiseasesAtherosclerosisCalciumFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlaque, AtheroscleroticRisk AssessmentTissue DistributionTomography, X-Ray ComputedCalciumAortic ArteriosclerosisAortic AtherosclerosisCardiovascular diseaseComputed tomographyThoracic aortaVascular calcification

Identifiers

PMID31748957
OpenAlexW2989789606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.