Observational studyWorld journal of urology2020
Differences in survival and impact of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with variant histology of tumors of the renal pelvis.
Observational study in World journal of urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Development of a nomogram for predicting cancer-specific survival in patients with renal pelvic cancer following surgery.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2025Article
- Review
- Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma with or without Kidney Transplantation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Case report: Sarcomatoid urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis masquerading as a renal abscess.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Impact of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Variant Histology of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Overall and Cancer-Specific Survival in Patients With Renal Pelvic Transitional Cell Carcinoma: A Population-Based Study.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe impact of variant histologies on overall survival (OS), as well as their influence on the response to neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is well studied in patients diagnosed with bladder cancer. However, little is known about tumors with variant histologies of the upper urinary tract. The objective of this study was to assess the survival of the predominant variant histologies of tumors of the renal pelvis (RPT) after surgical intervention, and to examine the influence of AC on the OS of the different variant histologies.
methodsWe identified 21,318 patients with RPT undergoing surgical intervention using the National Cancer Database for the period 2004-2015. We employed multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models and Kaplan-Meier curves to evaluate the OS according to variant histology. Separate multivariable Cox regression models were used to assess the specific effect of AC on OS of the histological subgroups.
resultsThe majority of patients were diagnosed with pure urothelial carcinoma (PUC) (96.1%). Overall, 826 patients were diagnosed with variant histologies (adenocarcinoma N = 298, squamous cell carcinoma N = 291, sarcomatoid N = 137, others N = 100). Compared to PUC, adenocarcinomas showed longer OS (HR 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62-0.94, p = 0.01), while sarcomatoid tumors had shorter OS (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.12-2.26, p = 0.011). A subgroup analysis of patients undergoing AC showed a survival benefit in patients with PUC (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.73-0.9, p < 0.001).
conclusionWe found that variant histologies of upper urinary tract carcinomas exhibit different survival rates and that AC was only associated with an OS benefit in patients with PUC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31748954What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.