Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31748919›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2020

The SIFK score: a validated predictive model for arthroplasty progression after subchondral insufficiency fractures of the knee.

Ayoosh Pareek, Chad W Parkes, Christopher D Bernard, Matthew P Abdel, Daniel B F Saris, Aaron J Krych

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Subchondral insufficiency fracture of the knee.Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Conservative treatments of bone marrow lesions.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Meniscal Extrusion: Diagnosis, Etiology, and Treatment Options.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Artificial intelligence and machine learning: an introduction for orthopaedic surgeons.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ayoosh PareekDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Chad W ParkesDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Christopher D BernardDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Matthew P AbdelDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Daniel B F SarisDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Aaron J KrychDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. krych.aaron@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3248-8007
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to create a predictive model utilizing baseline demographic and radiographic characteristics for the likelihood that a patient with subchondral insufficiency fracture of the knee will progress to knee arthroplasty with emphasis on clinical interpretability and usability.

methodsA retrospective review of baseline and final radiographs in addition to MRIs were reviewed for evaluation of insufficiency fractures and associated injuries. Patient and radiographic factors were used in building predictive models for progression to arthroplasty with Train: Validation: Test subsets. Multiple models were compared with emphasis on clinical utility.

resultsTotal of 249 patients with a mean age of 64.6 (SD 10.5) years were included. Knee arthroplasty rate was 27% at mean of 4 years of follow-up. Lasso Regression was non-inferior to other models and was chosen for ease of interpretability. In order of importance, predictors for progression to arthroplasty included lateral meniscus extrusion, Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 4, SIFK on MFC, lateral meniscus root tear, and medial meniscus extrusion. The final SIFK Score stratified patients into low-, medium-, and high-risk categories with arthroplasty rates of 8.8%, 40.4%, and 78.9% (p < 0.001) and an area under the curve of 82.5%.

conclusionIn this validated model, lateral meniscus extrusion, K-L Grade 4, SIFK on MFC, lateral meniscus root tear, and medial meniscus extrusion were the most important factors in predicting progression to arthroplasty (in that order). This model assists in patient treatment and counseling in providing prognostic information based on patient-specific risk factors by classifying them into a low-, medium-, and high-risk categories. This model can be used both by medical professionals treating musculoskeletal injuries in guiding patient decision making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAgedArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeDisease ProgressionFemaleFractures, StressHumansKnee JointMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMenisci, TibialMiddle AgedRadiographyRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTibial Meniscus InjuriesMachine learningMeniscus extrusionMeniscus tearPredictive modelRootSONKSPONKSpontaneous osteonecrosisSubchondral insufficiency fracture

Identifiers

PMID31748919
OpenAlexW2990722223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.