ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2020
Multi-tissue to whole plant metabolic modelling.
Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Resolving subcellular sucrose concentrations in plant tissues.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Review
- New insights in metabolism modelling to decipher plant-microbe interactions.The New phytologist · 2025Review
- In silico encounters: harnessing metabolic modelling to understand plant-microbe interactions.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2025Review
- A diel multi-tissue genome-scale metabolic model of Vitis vinifera.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Development and applications of metabolic models in plant multi-omics research.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Review
- Accurate flux predictions using tissue-specific gene expression in plant metabolic modeling.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Toward mechanistic modeling and rational engineering of plant respiration.Plant physiology · 2023Article
- A multi-organ metabolic model of tomato predicts plant responses to nutritional and genetic perturbations.Plant physiology · 2022Article
- Elucidating Plant-Microbe-Environment Interactions Through Omics-Enabled Metabolic Modelling Using Synthetic Communities.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Exploring synergies between plant metabolic modelling and machine learning.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Review
- Environment-coupled models of leaf metabolism.Biochemical Society transactions · 2021Review
- Systems biology: current status and challenges.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome-scale metabolic models have been successfully applied to study the metabolism of multiple plant species in the past decade. While most existing genome-scale modelling studies have focussed on studying the metabolic behaviour of individual plant metabolic systems, there is an increasing focus on combining models of multiple tissues or organs to produce multi-tissue models that allow the investigation of metabolic interactions between tissues and organs. Multi-tissue metabolic models were constructed for multiple plants including Arabidopsis, barley, soybean and Setaria. These models were applied to study various aspects of plant physiology including the division of labour between organs, source and sink tissue relationship, growth of different tissues and organs and charge and proton balancing. In this review, we outline the process of constructing multi-tissue genome-scale metabolic models, discuss the strengths and challenges in using multi-tissue models, review the current status of plant multi-tissue and whole plant metabolic models and explore the approaches for integrating genome-scale metabolic models into multi-scale plant models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.