ReviewMikrochimica acta2019
Recent progress in nanomaterial-based electrochemical biosensors for pathogenic bacteria.
Review in Mikrochimica acta, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Actively Targeted Nanoparticles for Enhanced Diagnosis, Treatment, and Vaccination of Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Pooled it
- Application of green synthesized WOScientific reports · 2021Trial
- Point-of-Care Electrochemical Diagnostic Developments for Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria: Role of Aptamers and Nanomaterials.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Biodetection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: nano-biosensors in detection; from principles to recent progresses.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- Polymicrobial Biofilms: Interkingdom Interactions, Resistance and Therapeutic Strategies.Microbial biotechnology · 2025Review
- Aptamer Sequence Optimization and Its Application in Food Safety Analysis.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Research Progress of Electrochemical Biosensors for Diseases Detection in China: A Review.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Recent advances in nanomaterials for the detection of mycobacterium tuberculosis (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2025Review
- A ratiometric electrochemical probe for the quantification of apixaban in unprocessed plasma samples using carbon aerogel/BFO modified glassy carbon electrodes.RSC advances · 2023Article
- Liquid crystal-assisted optical biosensor for early-stage diagnosis of mammary glands using HER-2.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Synthesis and characterization of folate-functionalized silica-based materials and application for bioimaging of cancer cells.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Electrochemical Biosensors as a Novel Platform in the Identification of Listeriosis Infection.Biosensors · 2023Review
- Spectrofluorimetric Method for Monitoring Methotrexate in Patients' Plasma Samples and Cell Lysates Using Highly Fluorescent Carbon Dots.Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR · 2022Article
- Genosensors as an alternative diagnostic sensing approaches for specific detection of virus species: A review of common techniques and outcomes.Trends in analytical chemistry : TRAC · 2022Review
- An Overview of Healthcare Associated Infections and Their Detection Methods Caused by Pathogen Bacteria in Romania and Europe.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Fast label-free identification of bacteria by synchronous fluorescence of amino acids.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2021Article
- Overview of Rapid Detection Methods forFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Biosensors Coupled with Signal Amplification Technology for the Detection of Pathogenic Bacteria: A Review.Biosensors · 2021Review
- Aptasensors forFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
- Analysis of pathogens, drug resistance, sensitive antibiotic treatment and risk factors of early-onset sepsis in very low birth weight infants.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review (with 118 refs.) discusses the progress made in electroanalytical methods based on the use of organic and inorganic nanomaterials for the determination of bacteria, specifically of E. coli, Salmonella, Staphylococcus, Mycobacterium, Listeria and Klebsiella species. We also discuss advantages and limitations of electrochemical methods. Strategies based on the use of aptamers, DNA and antibodies are covered. Following an introduction into electrochemical biosensing, a first large section covers methods for pathogen detection using metal nanoparticles, with subsections on silver nanoparticles, gold nanoparticles, magnetic nanoparticles and carbon-based nanomaterials. A second large section covers methods based on the use of organic nanocomposites, graphene and its derivatives. Other nanoparticles are treated in a final section. Several tables are presented that give an overview on the wealth of methods and materials. A concluding section summarizes the current status, addresses challenges, and gives an outlook on potential future trends. Graphical abstract This review demonstrates the progress made in electroanalytical methods based on the use of organic and inorganic nanomaterials for the detection and determination of pathogenic bacteria. We also discuss advantages and limitations of electrochemical methods. Strategies based on the use of aptamers, DNA and antibodies are covered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31748898What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.