Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31748879›Full record

SynthesisPathology oncology research : POR2020

Prognostic Significance of Cyclin D1 Expression in Renal Cell Carcinoma: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Zeyan Li, Jikai Liu, Xiang Zhang, Liang Fang, Cong Zhang, Zhao Zhang, Lei Yan, Yueqing Tang, Yidong Fan

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zeyan LiDepartment of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Wenhuaxi Road 44, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People's Republic of China.
Jikai LiuDepartment of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Wenhuaxi Road 44, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People's Republic of China.
Xiang ZhangDepartment of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Wenhuaxi Road 44, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People's Republic of China.
Liang FangDepartment of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Wenhuaxi Road 44, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People's Republic of China.
Cong ZhangDepartment of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Wenhuaxi Road 44, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People's Republic of China.
Zhao ZhangDepartment of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Wenhuaxi Road 44, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People's Republic of China.
Lei YanDepartment of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Wenhuaxi Road 44, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People's Republic of China.
Yueqing TangDepartment of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Wenhuaxi Road 44, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People's Republic of China. 512463267@qq.com.
Yidong FanDepartment of Urology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Wenhuaxi Road 44, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, People's Republic of China. fanyd@sdu.edu.cn.
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81672522Science Foundation of Shandong Province No.ZR2015HM046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies indicated that cyclin D1 shown the potential as a tumor biomarker. However, the prognostic value of cyclin D1 in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains controversial. This study investigated the correlation of cyclin D1 expression with the prognostic and clinicopathological features in RCC patients. We systematically searched the database of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science updated on November 26, 2017. Eighteen studies with 2282 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. Results demonstrated that cyclin D1 overexpression in RCC showed significant favorable prognostic impact on disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 0.57, 95% CI: 0.43-0.74) and disease-specific survival (DSS) (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.41-0.85) without significant heterogeneity. In subgroup of clear cell RCC, the prognostic effect on DFS was robust and the pooled HR was 0.39 (95% CI: 0.27-0.57). However, no association between overall survival (OS) and cyclin D1 expression was observed. Stratified analysis in DFS studies by sample size, staining patterns race and metastasis status showed similar results. Otherwise, cyclin D1 overexpression predicted a reduced prevalence of high TNM stage (T3 + T4) (OR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.40-0.99), high-grade tumor (G3 + G4) (OR 0.51, 95% CI: 0.31-0.81) and large tumor size (OR 0.35, 95% CI: 0.19-0.62). Our meta-analysis indicated that cyclin D1 overexpression could predict the favorable prognosis in patients with RCC.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Renal CellCyclin D1HumansKidney NeoplasmsPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCCND1 protein, humanCyclin D1Cyclin D1Meta-analysisPrognosisRenal cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID31748879
OpenAlexW2991305353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.