Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31748859›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2020

Safety and effectiveness of cervical vertebroplasty: report of a large cohort and systematic review.

Frédéric Clarençon, Robert Fahed, Evelyne Cormier, Idriss Haffaf, Jean-Philippe Spano, Eimad Shotar, Kévin Premat, Raphael Bonaccorsi, Vincent Degos, Jacques Chiras

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Complex posterolateral approach for C2 cementoplasty: A case report and review of the literature.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Frédéric ClarençonSorbonne University, Paris, France. frederic.clarencon@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6442-8239
Robert FahedDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Fondation A. de Rothschild, Paris, France.
Evelyne CormierSorbonne University, Paris, France.
Idriss HaffafSorbonne University, Paris, France.
Jean-Philippe SpanoDepartment of Neuroradiology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, 47, Bd de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France.
Eimad ShotarSorbonne University, Paris, France.
Kévin PrematSorbonne University, Paris, France.
Raphael BonaccorsiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Vincent DegosDepartment of Neuroradiology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, 47, Bd de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France.
Jacques ChirasSorbonne University, Paris, France.
Sorbonne Université · FRFondation de Rothschild · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate retrospectively safety and effectiveness of cervical vertebroplasty (cVP) based on a single-center large cohort. MATERIALS AND

methodsAll cVP performed at a single center from January 2001 to October 2014 were included and reviewed. Procedure-related complications (minor and major) were systematically recorded. Effectiveness in terms of analgesia was evaluated using a semi-quantitative grading scale at 1-month follow-up. Risk factors for the occurrence of a procedure-related complication or cement leakage, as well as factors influencing pain relief at 1-month follow-up, were evaluated using a multivariate analysis.

resultsOne hundred and forty cVP procedures (176 vertebrae) were performed in 130 consecutive patients (88 female, 42 male; mean age = 56 years) during the inclusion period. Among the treated lesions, 80% were bone metastases (mostly from breast cancer), 8% were related to hematological malignancies, and 12% were non-malignant lesions. One fatal complication (0.7%) was related to cement migration in the vertebrobasilar system. Three cervical hematomas were recorded, one of them requiring prolonged oral intubation. The overall rate of major complications was 1.5%. At 1 month, pain reduction was observed in 76% of the cases. Additional surgical fixation was required in 6.1% of the cases. cVP of more than one vertebra during the same session was an independent risk factor for procedure-related complications.

conclusionCervical vertebroplasty is a safe technique with an acceptable major complication rate. Its effectiveness in terms of pain relief is good at mid-term follow-up. KEY POINTS: • Cervical vertebroplasty (cVP) is a safe procedure with a low rate of major complications (1.5%). • cVP provides pain relief in 76% of the cases. • Additional fixation surgery is rarely required after cVP (6.1% of the cases).

Indexed as

Bone CementsCervical VertebraeNeck PainSystematic Reviews as TopicVertebroplastyAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain ManagementPain MeasurementBone CementsAnalgesiaSpineVertebroplasty

Identifiers

PMID31748859
OpenAlexW2989661296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.