ArticleEuropean radiology2020
Safety and effectiveness of cervical vertebroplasty: report of a large cohort and systematic review.
Article in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Subsequent fractures after vertebroplasty in osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2022Pooled it
- Complex posterolateral approach for C2 cementoplasty: A case report and review of the literature.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Review
- A modified anterolateral transdiscal percutaneous vertebroplasty with curved needle technique for C2/C3 metastases.European radiology · 2026Article
- Upper thoracic T1 and T2 percutaneous vertebroplasty: a review of 10 years of experience.European radiology · 2026Article
- Long-term outcome following vertebroplasty or bone cementoplasty in multiple myeloma patients.Neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Interventional Radiology Management of Bone Metastasis Pain: Strategies and Techniques.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2025Review
- State-of-the-art of multidisciplinary approach of bone metastasis-directed therapy: review and challenging questions for preparation of a GEMO practice guidelines.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2025Review
- Experimentally Validated Finite Element Analysis of Thoracic Spine Compression Fractures in a Porcine Model.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- CT-Guided Percutaneous Vertebroplasty of the Cervico-Thoracic Junction for the Management of Pathologic Fracture or Symptomatic Lytic Lesion in Cancer Patients.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2022Observational
- Vessel-Plasty Using Bone-Filling Mesh Container for Treatment of Malignant Severe Compression Fractures in Cervical Vertebrae.Journal of pain research · 2022Article
- Percutaneous vertebroplasty of the cervical spine performed via a posterior trans-pedicular approach.European radiology · 2021Article
- Combined Percutaneous Kyphoplasty/Pediculoplasty by Posterolateral Transpedicular Approach for Painful Cervical Spine Metastases: A Single-Center Prospective Study.Journal of pain research · 2021Article
- Letter to the editor regarding "Safety and Effectiveness of Cervical Vertebroplasty: Report of a Large Cohort and Systematic Review".European radiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate retrospectively safety and effectiveness of cervical vertebroplasty (cVP) based on a single-center large cohort. MATERIALS AND
methodsAll cVP performed at a single center from January 2001 to October 2014 were included and reviewed. Procedure-related complications (minor and major) were systematically recorded. Effectiveness in terms of analgesia was evaluated using a semi-quantitative grading scale at 1-month follow-up. Risk factors for the occurrence of a procedure-related complication or cement leakage, as well as factors influencing pain relief at 1-month follow-up, were evaluated using a multivariate analysis.
resultsOne hundred and forty cVP procedures (176 vertebrae) were performed in 130 consecutive patients (88 female, 42 male; mean age = 56 years) during the inclusion period. Among the treated lesions, 80% were bone metastases (mostly from breast cancer), 8% were related to hematological malignancies, and 12% were non-malignant lesions. One fatal complication (0.7%) was related to cement migration in the vertebrobasilar system. Three cervical hematomas were recorded, one of them requiring prolonged oral intubation. The overall rate of major complications was 1.5%. At 1 month, pain reduction was observed in 76% of the cases. Additional surgical fixation was required in 6.1% of the cases. cVP of more than one vertebra during the same session was an independent risk factor for procedure-related complications.
conclusionCervical vertebroplasty is a safe technique with an acceptable major complication rate. Its effectiveness in terms of pain relief is good at mid-term follow-up. KEY POINTS: • Cervical vertebroplasty (cVP) is a safe procedure with a low rate of major complications (1.5%). • cVP provides pain relief in 76% of the cases. • Additional fixation surgery is rarely required after cVP (6.1% of the cases).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.