Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31748856›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2020

Examining the upper urinary tract in patients with hematuria-time to revise the CT urography protocol?

Erik Rud, Kristina Flor Galtung, Peter Mæhre Lauritzen, Eduard Baco, Tove Flatabø, Gunnar Sandbæk

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Making sense of the CT Urogram.European radiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Erik RudDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. erik.rud@ous-hf.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3740-2519
Kristina Flor GaltungDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Peter Mæhre LauritzenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Eduard BacoDepartment of Urology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Tove FlatabøDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Gunnar SandbækDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThree-phase CT urography (CTU) is the gold standard for evaluating the upper urinary tract in patients with hematuria. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of CTU for detecting upper urothelial cell carcinomas (UCC) in patients with hematuria and negative cystoscopy. Secondly, we aimed to determine the tumor visibility on each CTU phase. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis retrospective study included all patients with hematuria referred to CTU after a negative cystoscopy during 2016 and 2017. The original CTU reports were dichotomized as negative or positive. All patient charts were reviewed after a minimum of 18-month follow-up in order to register missed cancers. The results of biopsies and clinical follow-up were used as the reference standard. Two reviewers retrospectively evaluated the tumor visibility of each CT sequence in all true-positive CTUs.

resultsWe included 376 patients with hematuria who underwent CTU after a negative cystoscopy. Macroscopic and microscopic hematuria occurred in 87% (327) and 13% (49), respectively. The incidence of upper urothelial cell carcinoma was 1.9% (7), and the sensitivity of CTU was 100% (95% CI, 59-100), specificity was 99% (95% CI, 98-100), positive predictive value was 88% (95% CI, 47-99), and negative predictive value was 100% (95% CI, 99-100). The accuracy was 99% (95% CI, 90-100). All UCCs were visible on the nephrographic phase for both reviewers.

conclusionCTU is highly accurate for detecting upper UCCs. All cases were seen on the nephrographic phase. This suggests that the CTU protocol can be simplified. KEY POINTS: • CT urography is highly accurate for detecting upper urothelial cell carcinomas. • All cancers were seen on the nephrographic phase. • All cancers were detected in patients with macroscopic hematuria.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Transitional CellCystoscopyFemaleHematuriaHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrinary TractHematuriaRenal cell carcinomaTransitional cell carcinomaUrography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.