Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31748842›Full record

SynthesisNeuropsychology review2019

Caregiver- and Clinician-Reported Adaptive Functioning in Rett Syndrome: a Systematic Review and Evaluation of Measurement Strategies.

Eric S Semmel, Michelle E Fox, Sabrina D Na, Rella Kautiainen, Robert D Latzman, Tricia Z King

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuropsychology review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Transcultural adaptation of the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System (ABAS-3).International journal of developmental disabilities · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eric S SemmelDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 5010, Atlanta, GA, 30302-5010, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6996-5335
Michelle E FoxDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 5010, Atlanta, GA, 30302-5010, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3833-0964
Sabrina D NaDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 5010, Atlanta, GA, 30302-5010, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3147-6063
Rella KautiainenDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 5010, Atlanta, GA, 30302-5010, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2432-3616
Robert D LatzmanDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 5010, Atlanta, GA, 30302-5010, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1175-8090
Tricia Z KingDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 5010, Atlanta, GA, 30302-5010, USA. tzking@gsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1363-9914
Georgia State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rett syndrome is the second most common cause of intellectual disability in females worldwide. The severity of many individuals' impairment limits the effectiveness of traditional assessment. However, clinician and parent reports of adaptive functioning may provide insight into these patients' abilities. This review aims to synthesize the current literature assessing adaptive functioning in Rett syndrome and evaluate existing measurement tools in this population. A search was conducted on PubMed using the search term "Rett syndrome." Studies that quantitatively assessed adaptive functioning outcomes in Rett syndrome with published and normed questionnaire measures were included. Twenty-three studies met inclusion criteria. Overall results indicate that the population of people with Rett syndrome is highly impaired, both in overall adaptive functioning as well as in specific subdomains (e.g., mobility, activities of daily living). Atypical Rett syndrome groups performed better on measures of adaptive functioning relative to patients with classic Rett syndrome. Our findings identified measurement weaknesses, as many of the studies found floor effects and therefore were unable to capture meaningful variability in outcomes. Individuals with Rett syndrome are highly reliant on caregivers due to disrupted adaptive functioning abilities. Optimizing measurement of adaptive skills in Rett syndrome will facilitate the quantification of meaningful change in skills and the identification of efficacious interventions aimed at improving outcomes and quality of life.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalPsychological TestsActivities of Daily LivingCaregiversCommunicationHealth PersonnelHumansRett SyndromeSocializationActivities of daily livingIntellectual disabilityMobility limitationOutcome assessment (health care)ReviewSelf-care

Identifiers

PMID31748842
OpenAlexW2990868095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.