Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31748823›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2020

White paper on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from society of abdominal radiology's disease-focused panel for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Part I, AJCC staging system, NCCN guidelines, and borderline resectable disease.

Naveen M Kulkarni, Erik V Soloff, Parag P Tolat, Guillermo P Sangster, Jason B Fleming, Olga R Brook, Zhen Jane Wang, Elizabeth M Hecht, Marc Zins, Priya R Bhosale and 4 more

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Post-neoadjuvant treatment pancreatic cancer resectability and outcome prediction using CT,Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Tumor size measurements of pancreatic cancer with neoadjuvant therapy based on RECIST guidelines: is MRI as effective as CT?Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023
    Article
  13. Treatment of pancreatic cancer in 2022.Cambridge prisms. Precision medicine · 2023
    Review
  14. Cells · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Reshaping preoperative treatment of pancreatic cancer in the era of precision medicine.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Naveen M KulkarniDepartment of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA. nkulkarni@mcw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5940-7521
Erik V SoloffDepartment of Radiology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Parag P TolatDepartment of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.
Guillermo P SangsterDepartment of Radiology, LSU Health - Shreveport Ochsner-LSU Health - Shreveport, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
Jason B FlemingGastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Olga R BrookDepartment of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Shapiro 4, Boston, MA, 02215-5400, USA.
Zhen Jane WangDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Elizabeth M HechtDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 W 168th St, PH1-317, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Marc ZinsDepartment of Radiology, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, 185 Rue Raymond Losserand, 75014, Paris, France.
Priya R BhosaleAbdominal Imaging Department, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1473, Houston, TX, 77030-400, USA.
Hina Arif-TiwariDepartment of Radiology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, 1501 N. Campbell Ave., P.O. Box 245067, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA.
Lorenzo MannelliIRCCS SDN, Naples, Italy.
Avinash R KambadakoneDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Eric P TammAbdominal Imaging Department, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1473, Houston, TX, 77030-400, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive gastrointestinal malignancy with a poor 5-year survival rate. Accurate staging of PDAC is an important initial step in the development of a stage-specific treatment plan. Different staging systems/consensus statements convened by different societies and academic practices are currently used. The most recent version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor/node/metastases (TNM) staging system for PDAC has shifted its focus from guiding management to assessing prognosis. In order to preoperatively define the resectability of PDAC and to guide management, additional classification systems have been developed. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, one of the most commonly used systems, provide recommendations on the management and the determination of resectability for PDAC. The NCCN divides PDAC into three categories of resectability based on tumor-vessel relationship: 'resectable,' 'borderline resectable,' and 'unresectable'. Among these, the borderline disease category is of special interest given its evolution over time and the resulting variations in the definition and the associated recommendations for management between different societies. It is important to be familiar with the evolving criteria, and treatment and follow-up recommendations for PDAC. In this article, the most current AJCC staging (8th edition), NCCN guidelines (version 2.2019-April 9, 2019), and challenges and controversies in borderline resectable PDAC are reviewed.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalHumansNeoplasm StagingPancreatic NeoplasmsPractice Guidelines as TopicUnited StatesAJCC stagingBorderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinomaNCCNPancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.